Determination of inter-individual differences in humeral head centre translations in subjects with healthy shoulders

Abstract The aims of this study were to (i) quantify glenohumeral (GH) joint translations in healthy shoulders, (ii) assess subject-specific variability in GH translations, (iii) determine whether bony joint geometry (glenoid height, width, retroversion, inclination, GH asphericity and congruence), upright scapular posture, motion and handheld load affect translation magnitude and (iv) analyse the position of the humeral head centre (HHC) starting point relative to different glenoid centre definitions. We measured translations of the HHC relative to the glenoid axes in 19 healthy subjects during five arm motions. Mean 3D, superoinferior (SI), anteroposterior (AP), and mediolateral (ML) translation magnitudes were 14.7% of glenoid height, 9.5% of glenoid height, 15.4% of glenoid width, and 7.4% of glenoid height, respectively. Glenoid height affected 3D and SI translation magnitude inclination angle, glenoid asphericity and scapular tilt affected 3D and AP translation magnitudes and motion affected 3D, AP and SI translation magnitudes (p≤ 0.05, but effect sizes are small and large confidence intervals warrant further experiments). The starting point of the HHC was closer to the glenoid geometric mean than to the inferior glenoid circle center, which may be useful clinically when attempting to restore healthy HHC positioning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.252309
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determination of inter-individual differences in humeral head centre translations in subjects with healthy shoulders

Eva C. Herbst, Heath B. Henninger, Stephen J. Ferguson, Philipp Moroder et al.
Royal Society Open Science
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Determination of inter-individual differences in humeral head centre translations in subjects with healthy shoulders

Eva C. Herbst, Heath B. Henninger, Stephen J. Ferguson, Philipp Moroder, Matteo Tanadini, Maximilian Modelhart, Flavia Stettler
article en

Abstract

Abstract The aims of this study were to (i) quantify glenohumeral (GH) joint translations in healthy shoulders, (ii) assess subject-specific variability in GH translations, (iii) determine whether bony joint geometry (glenoid height, width, retroversion, inclination, GH asphericity and congruence), upright scapular posture, motion and handheld load affect translation magnitude and (iv) analyse the position of the humeral head centre (HHC) starting point relative to different glenoid centre definitions. We measured translations of the HHC relative to the glenoid axes in 19 healthy subjects during five arm motions. Mean 3D, superoinferior (SI), anteroposterior (AP), and mediolateral (ML) translation magnitudes were 14.7% of glenoid height, 9.5% of glenoid height, 15.4% of glenoid width, and 7.4% of glenoid height, respectively. Glenoid height affected 3D and SI translation magnitude inclination angle, glenoid asphericity and scapular tilt affected 3D and AP translation magnitudes and motion affected 3D, AP and SI translation magnitudes (p≤ 0.05, but effect sizes are small and large confidence intervals warrant further experiments). The starting point of the HHC was closer to the glenoid geometric mean than to the inferior glenoid circle center, which may be useful clinically when attempting to restore healthy HHC positioning.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 13(10)
University of Utah (US), Paracelsus Medical University (AT), ETH Zurich (CH), Institute for Biomedical Engineering (CH), Schulthess-Klinik (CH), Swiss Data Science Center (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.