Lessons learned from using high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration units in care homes: interviews with care home staff, residents and relatives from the AFRI-c trial

Background Respiratory infections are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity among older adults in residential care homes. We conducted a qualitative study within the ‘Air Filtration to prevent symptomatic winter Respiratory Infections (including COVID-19) in care homes (AFRI-c)’ pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. This paper reports the lessons learned from using high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration units in a care home setting. Methods Interviews with care home staff (n=25), residents (n=20), and relatives (n=12) who participated in the AFRI-c trial were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Preventing respiratory infections was a high priority for staff. Although using HEPA filters became normalised during the intervention period, they were not considered suitable for all residents. The ability to lock settings or fix them to walls was identified as a potential way to improve them in this setting. Participants felt that the care home sector would be unable to afford the cost of HEPA filters for all residents and that their use would be prioritised for those with the greatest need. However, without financial support, HEPA filters may only be used by residents who can afford them. Staff felt that HEPA filters might be attractive to potential residents and their families, but consultees and residents were both more focused on overall quality of care and life. Maintenance of the HEPA filters had a minor impact on staff workload. Conclusions Although the AFRI-c trial found that HEPA filters did not reduce respiratory infections in residents, these insights could be valuable for care homes wishing to use HEPA filters for other reasons, such as reducing airborne pollutants and allergens. With some adaptions, portable HEPA filters could be made more suitable for use in care home settings. There were concerns that without financial support, inequalities could deepen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NIHR Open Research
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13993.2
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lessons learned from using high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration units in care homes: interviews with care home staff, residents and relatives from the AFRI-c trial

Clare Clement, Jane Sprackman, Sophie Rees, Alastair D Hay et al.
NIHR Open Research
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Lessons learned from using high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration units in care homes: interviews with care home staff, residents and relatives from the AFRI-c trial

Clare Clement, Jane Sprackman, Sophie Rees, Alastair D Hay, Ruth Kipping, Rachel C. M. Brierley, Karen Sargent
article en

Abstract

Background Respiratory infections are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity among older adults in residential care homes. We conducted a qualitative study within the ‘Air Filtration to prevent symptomatic winter Respiratory Infections (including COVID-19) in care homes (AFRI-c)’ pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. This paper reports the lessons learned from using high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration units in a care home setting. Methods Interviews with care home staff (n=25), residents (n=20), and relatives (n=12) who participated in the AFRI-c trial were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Preventing respiratory infections was a high priority for staff. Although using HEPA filters became normalised during the intervention period, they were not considered suitable for all residents. The ability to lock settings or fix them to walls was identified as a potential way to improve them in this setting. Participants felt that the care home sector would be unable to afford the cost of HEPA filters for all residents and that their use would be prioritised for those with the greatest need. However, without financial support, HEPA filters may only be used by residents who can afford them. Staff felt that HEPA filters might be attractive to potential residents and their families, but consultees and residents were both more focused on overall quality of care and life. Maintenance of the HEPA filters had a minor impact on staff workload. Conclusions Although the AFRI-c trial found that HEPA filters did not reduce respiratory infections in residents, these insights could be valuable for care homes wishing to use HEPA filters for other reasons, such as reducing airborne pollutants and allergens. With some adaptions, portable HEPA filters could be made more suitable for use in care home settings. There were concerns that without financial support, inequalities could deepen.

NIHR Open ResearchVol. 6
University of the West of England (GB), University of Bristol (GB), NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.