The effect of radiotherapy and surface treatment on immediate repair bond strength of two CAD/CAM materials

Abstract Background Patients undergoing radiotherapy often have limited tolerance for extensive restorative procedures. Therefore, repair of defective restorations using minimally invasive approaches is preferred. This study investigated the effects of radiotherapy and surface treatment on the repair micro-shear bond strength (µSBS) and nanoleakage (NL) of two water-stored CAD/CAM materials. Methods Eighty CAD/CAM specimens were stored in water for 6 months and assigned to eight groups according to irradiation exposure (irradiated or non-irradiated), material type [lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent, Liechtenstein) or CAD/CAM composite blocks (Grandio Blocs, VOCO, Germany), and surface treatment (abrasive bur or abrasive bur + silicon carbide (SiC) conditioning bur). For each material, irradiated specimens (single 6 meV irradiation dose) and non-irradiated specimens were initially prepared using an abrasive bur. Half of the specimens were subsequently conditioned using a SiC bur, while the remaining half received no additional SiC bur conditioning. Three composite cylinders were bonded to each specimen and subjected to µSBS testing at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Fracture modes was evaluated using stereomicroscopy and NL was qualitatively assessed for the presence or absence of silver nitrate deposits using SEM. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (α = 0.05). Results µSBS was significantly influenced by irradiation ( p < 0.0001), material type ( p < 0.0001), and surface treatment ( p = 0.039). The highest µSBS value (29.50 ± 3.13 MPa) was observed in non-irradiated CAD/CAM Resin Composite specimens treated with AB and SiC, whereas the lowest value (8.78 ± 1.72 MPa) was recorded in irradiated lithium disilicate specimens treated with AB alone. No significant difference in bond strength between surface treatments was found for the lithium disilicate material ( p = 0.423), whereas the Resin composite showed a significant difference ( p = 0.03). Adhesive failure predominated in lithium disilicate specimens (72.3%), while mixed failure predominated in CAD/CAM composite specimens (50%). No silver nitrate deposition was detected with respect to material type, irradiation, or surface treatment. Conclusion For irradiated patients, SiC conditioning bur seemed to be considered as extra step that does not enhance the repair SBS of CAD/CAM materials evaluated in this study.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09806-1
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of radiotherapy and surface treatment on immediate repair bond strength of two CAD/CAM materials

Reham Mohamed Salem, Farid Sabry El-Askary, Ahmed Adel Abdelaziz, Somaia Metwally ElSayed et al.
BMC Oral Health
Dental materials and restorations
article

The effect of radiotherapy and surface treatment on immediate repair bond strength of two CAD/CAM materials

Reham Mohamed Salem, Farid Sabry El-Askary, Ahmed Adel Abdelaziz, Somaia Metwally ElSayed, Amin Elsayed Amin, Zeinab Mohammed Morsy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients undergoing radiotherapy often have limited tolerance for extensive restorative procedures. Therefore, repair of defective restorations using minimally invasive approaches is preferred. This study investigated the effects of radiotherapy and surface treatment on the repair micro-shear bond strength (µSBS) and nanoleakage (NL) of two water-stored CAD/CAM materials. Methods Eighty CAD/CAM specimens were stored in water for 6 months and assigned to eight groups according to irradiation exposure (irradiated or non-irradiated), material type [lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent, Liechtenstein) or CAD/CAM composite blocks (Grandio Blocs, VOCO, Germany), and surface treatment (abrasive bur or abrasive bur + silicon carbide (SiC) conditioning bur). For each material, irradiated specimens (single 6 meV irradiation dose) and non-irradiated specimens were initially prepared using an abrasive bur. Half of the specimens were subsequently conditioned using a SiC bur, while the remaining half received no additional SiC bur conditioning. Three composite cylinders were bonded to each specimen and subjected to µSBS testing at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Fracture modes was evaluated using stereomicroscopy and NL was qualitatively assessed for the presence or absence of silver nitrate deposits using SEM. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (α = 0.05). Results µSBS was significantly influenced by irradiation ( p < 0.0001), material type ( p < 0.0001), and surface treatment ( p = 0.039). The highest µSBS value (29.50 ± 3.13 MPa) was observed in non-irradiated CAD/CAM Resin Composite specimens treated with AB and SiC, whereas the lowest value (8.78 ± 1.72 MPa) was recorded in irradiated lithium disilicate specimens treated with AB alone. No significant difference in bond strength between surface treatments was found for the lithium disilicate material ( p = 0.423), whereas the Resin composite showed a significant difference ( p = 0.03). Adhesive failure predominated in lithium disilicate specimens (72.3%), while mixed failure predominated in CAD/CAM composite specimens (50%). No silver nitrate deposition was detected with respect to material type, irradiation, or surface treatment. Conclusion For irradiated patients, SiC conditioning bur seemed to be considered as extra step that does not enhance the repair SBS of CAD/CAM materials evaluated in this study.

BMC Oral Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.