Low-velocity impact performance of aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with composite face sheets

Abstract In this study, AL 3003 aluminum honeycomb cores with heights of 10 mm and 15 mm, which have been widely used in the automotive, aerospace, and defense industries in recent years, were employed. As face sheet materials, glass/epoxy, carbon/epoxy, and Kevlar (aramid)/epoxy laminated composites produced via the vacuum infusion method were utilized. The thickness of the composite face sheets was maintained at approximately 2 mm. Each sandwich composite specimen was fabricated by bonding 100 mm × 100 mm composite plates to the upper and lower surfaces of the honeycomb core using an epoxy-based adhesive. The prepared specimens were subjected to low-velocity impact loading at energy levels of 40 J, 60 J, 80 J, 100 J, 120 J, and 160 J using a CEAST Fractovis Plus impact testing machine. The experimental results indicated that the contact force decreased as the core height increased from 10 mm to 15 mm. Furthermore, glass- and Kevlar-based composites exhibited higher elastic energy absorption compared to carbon-based composites. The findings also revealed that both the type of face sheet material and the core height significantly influence the impact resistance of the sandwich structures, leading to different damage mechanisms under impact loading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials Testing
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2026-0106
Primary Topic
Cellular and Composite Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-velocity impact performance of aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with composite face sheets

Okan Özdemir, Mehmet Emin Deniz, Kasım Karataş
Materials Testing
Cellular and Composite Structures
article

Low-velocity impact performance of aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with composite face sheets

Okan Özdemir, Mehmet Emin Deniz, Kasım Karataş
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this study, AL 3003 aluminum honeycomb cores with heights of 10 mm and 15 mm, which have been widely used in the automotive, aerospace, and defense industries in recent years, were employed. As face sheet materials, glass/epoxy, carbon/epoxy, and Kevlar (aramid)/epoxy laminated composites produced via the vacuum infusion method were utilized. The thickness of the composite face sheets was maintained at approximately 2 mm. Each sandwich composite specimen was fabricated by bonding 100 mm × 100 mm composite plates to the upper and lower surfaces of the honeycomb core using an epoxy-based adhesive. The prepared specimens were subjected to low-velocity impact loading at energy levels of 40 J, 60 J, 80 J, 100 J, 120 J, and 160 J using a CEAST Fractovis Plus impact testing machine. The experimental results indicated that the contact force decreased as the core height increased from 10 mm to 15 mm. Furthermore, glass- and Kevlar-based composites exhibited higher elastic energy absorption compared to carbon-based composites. The findings also revealed that both the type of face sheet material and the core height significantly influence the impact resistance of the sandwich structures, leading to different damage mechanisms under impact loading.

Materials Testing
Dokuz Eylül University (TR), Batman University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Cellular and Composite Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Low-velocity impact performance of aluminum honeycomb sandwich structures with composite face sheets — Okan Özdemir, Mehmet Emin Deniz, et al. · Materials Testing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS