Evaluating the inoculation of four different bacterial pathogens on the development of liver abscesses in beef × dairy crossbred heifers

Abstract Our objective was to assess liver abscess (LA) prevalence in beef × dairy heifers subjected to individual intraruminal bacterial inoculations of F. necrophorum subsp. necrophorum, subsp. funduliforme, Trueperella pyogenes, or Salmonella enterica serotype Lubbock to further understand their etiological roles in LA formation. Beef × dairy heifers (n = 40, initial BW = 126 ± 1.1 kg) were assigned randomly to 1 of 4 treatments: FN = F. necrophorum subsp. necrophorum alone; FF = F. necrophorum subsp. funduliforme alone; TP = T. pyogenes alone; or SL = S. enterica serotype Lubbock alone. Heifers received two doses of 100 mL inoculum consisting of ∼1.0 x 109 CFU/g mL each. Heifer was the experimental unit. Feed disappearance and hematology measurements were analyzed as repeated measures. The model included fixed effects of treatment, sampling day, and treatment × sampling day interaction, with heifer nested within treatment as the subject of the repeated measure. Differences in the percentage prevalence of gross pathology scores among treatments were analyzed as binomial proportions with treatment as a fixed effect. Prevalence of LA was 10, 0, 0, and 0% for FN, FF, TP, and SL, respectively, and did not differ among treatments (P = 1.00). No differences among treatments were observed for rumenitis, lungs, colon, or ileal scores (P ≥ 0.38). While no difference among treatments was observed (P = 0.95), an abundance of LA scars across treatments were recorded (38%). While prevalence was lower than expected, FN was the only treatment to present with an active LA at harvest. The abundance of LA scars across treatments warrants further investigation as timeframe for LA formation and resolution are not fully understood.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Animal Science
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txag156
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the inoculation of four different bacterial pathogens on the development of liver abscesses in beef × dairy crossbred heifers

Colten W Dornbach, Paul Rand Broadway, Nicole C Burdick Sanchez, Landon G. Canterbury et al.
Translational Animal Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Evaluating the inoculation of four different bacterial pathogens on the development of liver abscesses in beef × dairy crossbred heifers

Colten W Dornbach, Paul Rand Broadway, Nicole C Burdick Sanchez, Landon G. Canterbury, Leigh Ann George, Xiaorong Shi, Raghavendra G G Amachawadi, T.E. Lawrence, Michael L. Galyean, T. G. Nagaraja, Madeline S Grant, Mina Abbasi, Kallie D Childress, Trent E Schwartz, Kristin E Hales, Taylor A. Loeffler, Blake J. Sitka, Madelynn G Baker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Our objective was to assess liver abscess (LA) prevalence in beef × dairy heifers subjected to individual intraruminal bacterial inoculations of F. necrophorum subsp. necrophorum, subsp. funduliforme, Trueperella pyogenes, or Salmonella enterica serotype Lubbock to further understand their etiological roles in LA formation. Beef × dairy heifers (n = 40, initial BW = 126 ± 1.1 kg) were assigned randomly to 1 of 4 treatments: FN = F. necrophorum subsp. necrophorum alone; FF = F. necrophorum subsp. funduliforme alone; TP = T. pyogenes alone; or SL = S. enterica serotype Lubbock alone. Heifers received two doses of 100 mL inoculum consisting of ∼1.0 x 109 CFU/g mL each. Heifer was the experimental unit. Feed disappearance and hematology measurements were analyzed as repeated measures. The model included fixed effects of treatment, sampling day, and treatment × sampling day interaction, with heifer nested within treatment as the subject of the repeated measure. Differences in the percentage prevalence of gross pathology scores among treatments were analyzed as binomial proportions with treatment as a fixed effect. Prevalence of LA was 10, 0, 0, and 0% for FN, FF, TP, and SL, respectively, and did not differ among treatments (P = 1.00). No differences among treatments were observed for rumenitis, lungs, colon, or ileal scores (P ≥ 0.38). While no difference among treatments was observed (P = 0.95), an abundance of LA scars across treatments were recorded (38%). While prevalence was lower than expected, FN was the only treatment to present with an active LA at harvest. The abundance of LA scars across treatments warrants further investigation as timeframe for LA formation and resolution are not fully understood.

Translational Animal Science
Texas Tech University (US), West Texas A&M University (US), Kansas State University (US), Issues Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.