Blurred borders: Kurds, empires, and identity in the Caucasus

This article examines Kurdish populations in the Caucasus borderlands within the context of Ottoman–Russian imperial rivalry from the nineteenth century through the aftermath of the First World War. It argues that Kurdish political behavior in this frontier zone is best understood through the structural dynamics of interimperial competition and shifting sovereignty rather than through ethnic or nationalist explanations alone. Drawing on Russian, Ottoman and British archival sources, the study shows that Kurdish communities exercised situational agency by negotiating loyalties and exploiting imperial rivalries to pursue security, autonomy and material advantage. The article also problematizes the retrospective projection of fixed Kurdish identity onto the Caucasus, emphasizing the multiform and contingent nature of Kurdish identification prior to the emergence of modern nationalism. Finally, it situates Kurdish–Armenian relations and wartime violence within the broader framework of imperial policies, frontier militarization and imperial collapse, highlighting the decisive role of state strategies in shaping intercommunal relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Middle Eastern Studies
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2026.2740134
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blurred borders: Kurds, empires, and identity in the Caucasus

Hakan Özoğlu
Middle Eastern Studies
Soviet and Russian History
article

Blurred borders: Kurds, empires, and identity in the Caucasus

Hakan Özoğlu
article en

Abstract

This article examines Kurdish populations in the Caucasus borderlands within the context of Ottoman–Russian imperial rivalry from the nineteenth century through the aftermath of the First World War. It argues that Kurdish political behavior in this frontier zone is best understood through the structural dynamics of interimperial competition and shifting sovereignty rather than through ethnic or nationalist explanations alone. Drawing on Russian, Ottoman and British archival sources, the study shows that Kurdish communities exercised situational agency by negotiating loyalties and exploiting imperial rivalries to pursue security, autonomy and material advantage. The article also problematizes the retrospective projection of fixed Kurdish identity onto the Caucasus, emphasizing the multiform and contingent nature of Kurdish identification prior to the emergence of modern nationalism. Finally, it situates Kurdish–Armenian relations and wartime violence within the broader framework of imperial policies, frontier militarization and imperial collapse, highlighting the decisive role of state strategies in shaping intercommunal relations.

Middle Eastern Studies
University of Central Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Blurred borders: Kurds, empires, and identity in the Caucasus — Hakan Özoğlu · Middle Eastern Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS