Multi-Criteria GIS Prioritization of Urban Housing Renovation: A Case Study of Astana, Kazakhstan

Housing-renovation programs in post-Soviet cities typically rely on a single wear-percentage threshold to decide which buildings are demolished, disregarding the building age relative to normative service life, population density, and construction logistics. This study develops a reproducible multi-criteria GIS framework applied to the 174 buildings in Astana’s officially approved 2026–2030 renovation program. Each building was assigned a normative service life, flagged as “Condemned” (wear ≥ 61%) and/or “Dilapidated” (age ≥ normative Lifespan), scored with a composite four-variable Priority index, assigned geographic coordinates through manual online-map search, and linked to an Ordinary Kriging-interpolated population-density surface (heatmap) across all six of the city’s administrative districts. Each building was then assigned one of six differentiated renovation decisions (demolish–expand, demolish–rebuild, demolish–reduce, reconstruct–expand, capital repair, or exclude) based on its condition flags and local density class, and rescheduled across 2026–2030 to equalize the annual floor-area workload. Statistical analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between building age and wear (ρ = −0.157, p = 0.038), no significant effect of wall material on wear once construction types are consolidated into comparable categories (Kruskal–Wallis H = 5.62, p = 0.230), and highly uneven spatial concentration of Condemned buildings across the districts (χ2 = 28.48, p < 0.0001). The rescheduled program reduces year-to-year floor-area imbalance from a coefficient of variation of 41.8% to 4.8%, and four buildings meeting neither condition criterion were identified as candidates for removal from the program. Limitations concerning density resolution, geocoding precision, and criterion weighting are discussed alongside a concrete agenda for spatial clustering of construction logistics, investment-sensitive decisions, and city master-plan integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7100525
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Criteria GIS Prioritization of Urban Housing Renovation: A Case Study of Astana, Kazakhstan

Matija Orešković, Timur Zhussupov, Aleksej Aniskin, Yelbek Bakhitovich Utepov
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Urban Planning and Valuation
article

Multi-Criteria GIS Prioritization of Urban Housing Renovation: A Case Study of Astana, Kazakhstan

Matija Orešković, Timur Zhussupov, Aleksej Aniskin, Yelbek Bakhitovich Utepov
article en

Abstract

Housing-renovation programs in post-Soviet cities typically rely on a single wear-percentage threshold to decide which buildings are demolished, disregarding the building age relative to normative service life, population density, and construction logistics. This study develops a reproducible multi-criteria GIS framework applied to the 174 buildings in Astana’s officially approved 2026–2030 renovation program. Each building was assigned a normative service life, flagged as “Condemned” (wear ≥ 61%) and/or “Dilapidated” (age ≥ normative Lifespan), scored with a composite four-variable Priority index, assigned geographic coordinates through manual online-map search, and linked to an Ordinary Kriging-interpolated population-density surface (heatmap) across all six of the city’s administrative districts. Each building was then assigned one of six differentiated renovation decisions (demolish–expand, demolish–rebuild, demolish–reduce, reconstruct–expand, capital repair, or exclude) based on its condition flags and local density class, and rescheduled across 2026–2030 to equalize the annual floor-area workload. Statistical analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between building age and wear (ρ = −0.157, p = 0.038), no significant effect of wall material on wear once construction types are consolidated into comparable categories (Kruskal–Wallis H = 5.62, p = 0.230), and highly uneven spatial concentration of Condemned buildings across the districts (χ2 = 28.48, p < 0.0001). The rescheduled program reduces year-to-year floor-area imbalance from a coefficient of variation of 41.8% to 4.8%, and four buildings meeting neither condition criterion were identified as candidates for removal from the program. Limitations concerning density resolution, geocoding precision, and criterion weighting are discussed alongside a concrete agenda for spatial clustering of construction logistics, investment-sensitive decisions, and city master-plan integration.

Eng—Advances in EngineeringVol. 7(10)
L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University (KZ), University North (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Urban Planning and Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.