A Cubic q‐Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Decision Framework for Offshore Wind Farm Site Selection Using Entropy Weighting and Ideal‐Solution‐Based Ranking

ABSTRACT In offshore wind power development, offshore wind farm siting (OWFS) is a crucial yet complex decision process, often compromised by expert linguistic ambiguity, multidimensional expert evaluation and conflicting criteria. To tackle these challenges, this study proposes an integrated multicriteria group decision‐making (MCGDM) framework that integrates the entropy weight method (EWM) with the cubic q‐rung orthopair fuzzy extension of TOPSIS (Cq‐ROF‐TOPSIS). First, a hierarchical evaluation system consisting of six main criteria and 22 subcriteria is established, grounded in literature research. A dual‐layer weighting scheme is implemented to determine criteria weights. Specifically, main criteria weights are elicited from expert scoring, whereas subcriteria weights are objectively computed via EWM. Subsequently, expert evaluations are quantified as Cq‐ROF numbers to construct individual Cq‐ROF decision matrices, which are then aggregated into a comprehensive decision matrix using the power average operator. During this stage, a dynamic mechanism is employed to calculate expert weights based on their mutual support degrees, thereby effectively minimizing the negative impacts of extreme or biased assessments. Finally, the Cq‐ROF‐TOPSIS model ranks alternative sites based on their closeness coefficients to the positive ideal solution. A case study demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed framework, while stability analysis across values confirms its robustness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Systems
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.70449
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Cubic q‐Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Decision Framework for Offshore Wind Farm Site Selection Using Entropy Weighting and Ideal‐Solution‐Based Ranking

Xiaoyan Bian, Li Xu, Fei Chen
Expert Systems
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

A Cubic q‐Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Decision Framework for Offshore Wind Farm Site Selection Using Entropy Weighting and Ideal‐Solution‐Based Ranking

Xiaoyan Bian, Li Xu, Fei Chen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In offshore wind power development, offshore wind farm siting (OWFS) is a crucial yet complex decision process, often compromised by expert linguistic ambiguity, multidimensional expert evaluation and conflicting criteria. To tackle these challenges, this study proposes an integrated multicriteria group decision‐making (MCGDM) framework that integrates the entropy weight method (EWM) with the cubic q‐rung orthopair fuzzy extension of TOPSIS (Cq‐ROF‐TOPSIS). First, a hierarchical evaluation system consisting of six main criteria and 22 subcriteria is established, grounded in literature research. A dual‐layer weighting scheme is implemented to determine criteria weights. Specifically, main criteria weights are elicited from expert scoring, whereas subcriteria weights are objectively computed via EWM. Subsequently, expert evaluations are quantified as Cq‐ROF numbers to construct individual Cq‐ROF decision matrices, which are then aggregated into a comprehensive decision matrix using the power average operator. During this stage, a dynamic mechanism is employed to calculate expert weights based on their mutual support degrees, thereby effectively minimizing the negative impacts of extreme or biased assessments. Finally, the Cq‐ROF‐TOPSIS model ranks alternative sites based on their closeness coefficients to the positive ideal solution. A case study demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed framework, while stability analysis across values confirms its robustness.

Expert SystemsVol. 43(11)
Shanghai University of Electric Power (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.