Patient Perspectives on Offers of Buprenorphine in the Emergency Department

Importance Buprenorphine reduces mortality in opioid use disorder (OUD), and emergency department–initiated buprenorphine (EDIB) doubles 30-day treatment retention, yet many patients decline EDIB when offered. Patient-driven factors limiting uptake are not well characterized. Objective To identify factors associated with patients accepting or declining EDIB. Design, Setting, and Participants Convergent parallel mixed-methods qualitative study conducted from May 1 to December 31, 2023, with data analyses performed from March 2025 to April 2026, at 4 emergency departments within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) in South Carolina, Michigan, and Ohio. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with OUD who were offered buprenorphine by clinical staff were eligible; prisoners and patients concurrently enrolled in other CTN trials of OUD treatment or overdose prevention were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were acceptance or declination of EDIB; validated measures of treatment readiness (Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Engagement Scale [SOCRATES]), cultural mistrust, perceived discrimination, and social needs; and qualitative interview themes regarding reasons for accepting or declining buprenorphine. Results Eighty-two participants completed the study (median [IQR] age, 38 [31-53.5] years; 52 male [64%]). Overall, 19 participants (23%) declined buprenorphine. Among 54 participants who described reasons for accepting EDIB, motivators for accepting EDIB included assistance with opioid withdrawal (37 [69%]), desire to be substance free (21 [39%]), wanting to return to a “normal life” (15 [28%]), fear of overdose or death (13 [24%]), and caring for children (7 [13%]). Among 22 participants who described reasons for declining EDIB, barriers included concern about precipitated withdrawal or adverse effects (11 [50%]), not wanting to be physically dependent on buprenorphine (7 [32%]), and housing and logistical barriers (5 [23%]). SOCRATES treatment readiness (1-5 scale) was similar in patients who accepted (mean [SD] score, 4.11 [0.55]) and declined (mean [SD] score, 4.05 [0.50]) EDIB. Conclusions and Relevance In this mixed-methods qualitative study of adult ED patients with OUD who were offered buprenorphine, declination was driven less by low treatment readiness than by specific, addressable concerns: precipitated withdrawal, physical dependence, and housing and logistical barriers. Targeted interventions addressing these concerns may increase uptake of this life-saving treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.37671
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient Perspectives on Offers of Buprenorphine in the Emergency Department

Louise F. Haynes, Kelly Stephenson Barth, Phillip Moschella, Kathleen T. Brady et al.
JAMA Network Open
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

Patient Perspectives on Offers of Buprenorphine in the Emergency Department

Louise F. Haynes, Kelly Stephenson Barth, Phillip Moschella, Kathleen T. Brady, Jacob J. Manteuffel, Susan C. Sonne, Lindsey K. Jennings, Carrie E. Papa, Alain H. Litwin, Angela D. Moreland, Suzanne Lane, Alyssa Rafferty, Heather McCowin
article en

Abstract

Importance Buprenorphine reduces mortality in opioid use disorder (OUD), and emergency department–initiated buprenorphine (EDIB) doubles 30-day treatment retention, yet many patients decline EDIB when offered. Patient-driven factors limiting uptake are not well characterized. Objective To identify factors associated with patients accepting or declining EDIB. Design, Setting, and Participants Convergent parallel mixed-methods qualitative study conducted from May 1 to December 31, 2023, with data analyses performed from March 2025 to April 2026, at 4 emergency departments within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) in South Carolina, Michigan, and Ohio. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with OUD who were offered buprenorphine by clinical staff were eligible; prisoners and patients concurrently enrolled in other CTN trials of OUD treatment or overdose prevention were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were acceptance or declination of EDIB; validated measures of treatment readiness (Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Engagement Scale [SOCRATES]), cultural mistrust, perceived discrimination, and social needs; and qualitative interview themes regarding reasons for accepting or declining buprenorphine. Results Eighty-two participants completed the study (median [IQR] age, 38 [31-53.5] years; 52 male [64%]). Overall, 19 participants (23%) declined buprenorphine. Among 54 participants who described reasons for accepting EDIB, motivators for accepting EDIB included assistance with opioid withdrawal (37 [69%]), desire to be substance free (21 [39%]), wanting to return to a “normal life” (15 [28%]), fear of overdose or death (13 [24%]), and caring for children (7 [13%]). Among 22 participants who described reasons for declining EDIB, barriers included concern about precipitated withdrawal or adverse effects (11 [50%]), not wanting to be physically dependent on buprenorphine (7 [32%]), and housing and logistical barriers (5 [23%]). SOCRATES treatment readiness (1-5 scale) was similar in patients who accepted (mean [SD] score, 4.11 [0.55]) and declined (mean [SD] score, 4.05 [0.50]) EDIB. Conclusions and Relevance In this mixed-methods qualitative study of adult ED patients with OUD who were offered buprenorphine, declination was driven less by low treatment readiness than by specific, addressable concerns: precipitated withdrawal, physical dependence, and housing and logistical barriers. Targeted interventions addressing these concerns may increase uptake of this life-saving treatment.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(10)
Prisma Health (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), Henry Ford Health System (US), Mercy Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.