Grassland soil bulk density decreases under grazing exclusion and responds asymmetrically to altered precipitation

Soil structure is a key determinant of grassland health and functioning, with bulk density serving as a widely used proxy. Grazing exclusion is a common restoration practice that often reduces soil bulk density in grasslands by restoring plant productivity and removing livestock trampling. Plant productivity is strongly influenced by precipitation, but the interactive effects of precipitation and grazing exclusion on grassland soil bulk density remain unclear. We presented a synthesis based on 671 paired observations from 111 field studies to investigate the responses of soil bulk density in grasslands to grazing exclusion and altered precipitation, and the key drivers. Overall, grazing exclusion decreased soil bulk density by 7.88% compared to grazing, with the strongest effect occurring in tropical grasslands and in surface soils. This decrease was more strongly controlled by standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) than by soil factors, declining with increasing wetness and becoming negligible in severely wet regions. Under altered precipitation, increased precipitation reduced bulk density by 9.06% relative to ambient precipitation, whereas decreased precipitation increased it by 17.10%, showing an asymmetric response. In extreme events, the response per unit precipitation change was stronger for decreased than for increased precipitation. The asymmetric response was directly and negatively related to SPEI, soil organic carbon content, and the magnitude of precipitation change. Publication bias and sensitivity analysis confirmed that the results were reliable. These results quantitatively demonstrate the global-scale decrease in grassland soil bulk density under grazing exclusion and its asymmetric response to altered precipitation. The results suggest that the efficacy of grazing exclusion in reducing soil bulk density is probably modulated by precipitation regimes, particularly extreme events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CATENA
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2026.110674
Primary Topic
Soil Management and Crop Yield
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grassland soil bulk density decreases under grazing exclusion and responds asymmetrically to altered precipitation

Pete Smith, Decai Gao, Litao Lin, Ya Han et al.
CATENA
Soil Management and Crop Yield
article

Grassland soil bulk density decreases under grazing exclusion and responds asymmetrically to altered precipitation

Pete Smith, Decai Gao, Litao Lin, Ya Han, Yiqi Luo, Yunhai Zhang, Jungang Chen, Futao Zhang
article en

Abstract

Soil structure is a key determinant of grassland health and functioning, with bulk density serving as a widely used proxy. Grazing exclusion is a common restoration practice that often reduces soil bulk density in grasslands by restoring plant productivity and removing livestock trampling. Plant productivity is strongly influenced by precipitation, but the interactive effects of precipitation and grazing exclusion on grassland soil bulk density remain unclear. We presented a synthesis based on 671 paired observations from 111 field studies to investigate the responses of soil bulk density in grasslands to grazing exclusion and altered precipitation, and the key drivers. Overall, grazing exclusion decreased soil bulk density by 7.88% compared to grazing, with the strongest effect occurring in tropical grasslands and in surface soils. This decrease was more strongly controlled by standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) than by soil factors, declining with increasing wetness and becoming negligible in severely wet regions. Under altered precipitation, increased precipitation reduced bulk density by 9.06% relative to ambient precipitation, whereas decreased precipitation increased it by 17.10%, showing an asymmetric response. In extreme events, the response per unit precipitation change was stronger for decreased than for increased precipitation. The asymmetric response was directly and negatively related to SPEI, soil organic carbon content, and the magnitude of precipitation change. Publication bias and sensitivity analysis confirmed that the results were reliable. These results quantitatively demonstrate the global-scale decrease in grassland soil bulk density under grazing exclusion and its asymmetric response to altered precipitation. The results suggest that the efficacy of grazing exclusion in reducing soil bulk density is probably modulated by precipitation regimes, particularly extreme events.

CATENAVol. 275
University of Aberdeen (GB), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Cornell University (US), Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN), Institute of Botany (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Hebei GEO University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Soil Management and Crop Yield
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.