Professional Perspectives on Children's Participation in the Chilean Child Protection System

ABSTRACT Meaningful participation in child protection systems is crucial for enhancing both decision‐making processes and the lives of children and adolescents. This study explores professionals' perceptions of child participation and risk assessment within the Chilean Child Protection System. Using the questionnaire 1st Study on Participation and Decision‐Making in Child Protection, data were collected from 112 professionals, including psychologists, social workers, occupational therapists, curadores ad litem and Family Court judges. The survey addressed risk of maltreatment, attitudes towards child participation in residential settings and the implementation of participatory practices in residential care. Findings show that professionals generally support separating children from their families when risks are identified, particularly in cases of abuse or neglect, and express greater trust in foster families compared to residential care. Positive attitudes towards child participation are evident, though ambivalence emerges in relation to structural or nonroutine decisions, such as changes in placement. While participatory practices are reported as common, their use decreases when children are invited to influence their own treatment or intervention plans. Understanding professionals' perceptions is critical to identifying the factors that enable or hinder participation and to strengthening children's role in shaping protective interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child & Family Social Work
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.70281
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Professional Perspectives on Children's Participation in the Chilean Child Protection System

Manuela García Quiroga, Valentina Vallejo-Correa, Alejandra Paz Yáñez-Cancino
Child & Family Social Work
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

Professional Perspectives on Children's Participation in the Chilean Child Protection System

Manuela García Quiroga, Valentina Vallejo-Correa, Alejandra Paz Yáñez-Cancino
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Meaningful participation in child protection systems is crucial for enhancing both decision‐making processes and the lives of children and adolescents. This study explores professionals' perceptions of child participation and risk assessment within the Chilean Child Protection System. Using the questionnaire 1st Study on Participation and Decision‐Making in Child Protection, data were collected from 112 professionals, including psychologists, social workers, occupational therapists, curadores ad litem and Family Court judges. The survey addressed risk of maltreatment, attitudes towards child participation in residential settings and the implementation of participatory practices in residential care. Findings show that professionals generally support separating children from their families when risks are identified, particularly in cases of abuse or neglect, and express greater trust in foster families compared to residential care. Positive attitudes towards child participation are evident, though ambivalence emerges in relation to structural or nonroutine decisions, such as changes in placement. While participatory practices are reported as common, their use decreases when children are invited to influence their own treatment or intervention plans. Understanding professionals' perceptions is critical to identifying the factors that enable or hinder participation and to strengthening children's role in shaping protective interventions.

Child & Family Social Work
University of Groningen (NL), Viña del Mar University (CL), Pontificial Catholic University of Valparaiso (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.