Talking heads: communication and responsiveness at the European Council

This paper examines how national leaders use public communication during European Council summits to signal responsiveness to their domestic constituencies. Drawing on a novel dataset of over 4500 media engagements during the summits between 2009 and 2025, the study explores how ‘representative claims’ – claims to represent domestic constituencies – in leader's public communication respond to electoral pressures and salience of EU politics. The results show that leaders use more representative claims during their public communication at European Council meetings particularly when facing upcoming domestic elections and when the salience of EU issues is high domestically. However, this pattern emerges predominantly in communication before the start of the negotiations. Hence, whether claim-based rhetoric is driven by strategic or responsiveness motivations remains unclear. These findings highlight that the European Council is both a high-level arena for consensual intergovernmental decision-making and a normalised stage for electorally-oriented public communication in a multilevel polity. The study contributes to the literatures on rhetorical representation and on the role of national elections and public salience in European-level decision-making processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Public Policy
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2026.2742309
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Talking heads: communication and responsiveness at the European Council

Michele Scotto di Vettimo
Journal of European Public Policy
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Talking heads: communication and responsiveness at the European Council

Michele Scotto di Vettimo
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how national leaders use public communication during European Council summits to signal responsiveness to their domestic constituencies. Drawing on a novel dataset of over 4500 media engagements during the summits between 2009 and 2025, the study explores how ‘representative claims’ – claims to represent domestic constituencies – in leader's public communication respond to electoral pressures and salience of EU politics. The results show that leaders use more representative claims during their public communication at European Council meetings particularly when facing upcoming domestic elections and when the salience of EU issues is high domestically. However, this pattern emerges predominantly in communication before the start of the negotiations. Hence, whether claim-based rhetoric is driven by strategic or responsiveness motivations remains unclear. These findings highlight that the European Council is both a high-level arena for consensual intergovernmental decision-making and a normalised stage for electorally-oriented public communication in a multilevel polity. The study contributes to the literatures on rhetorical representation and on the role of national elections and public salience in European-level decision-making processes.

Journal of European Public Policy
King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Talking heads: communication and responsiveness at the European Council — Michele Scotto di Vettimo · Journal of European Public Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS