Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism as predictors of manipulation tactics

Narcissism is associated with the manipulation of interpersonal encounters to fulfil specific interpersonal needs. Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism are driven by different interpersonal needs, yet it is unclear whether these differences appear in their manipulation tactics. The current study examined whether grandiose and vulnerable narcissism differ in their associations with Buss’s (Citation1992, Journal of Personality, 60(2), 477–499) twelve manipulation tactics. A sample of 280 undergraduate students completed the Pathological Narcissism Inventory and the Tactics of Manipulation scale. Structural equation modelling was employed in two stages, with a full exploratory model examining associations across all tactics, followed by a trimmed model retaining only significant paths (CFI = 0.993, SRMR = 0.041). Grandiose narcissism was associated with ten of the 12 tactics in the trimmed model, largely at small-to-moderate effect sizes, whereas three tactics related to vulnerable narcissism. Using Jonason and Webster (Citation2012, Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 521–526) protean approach as a theoretical context, it is suggested that grandiose narcissism’s approach motivation aligns with tactics oriented towards status and dominance. Vulnerable narcissism’s rejection sensitivity and avoidance approach support the use of lower risk tactics. The findings indicate that narcissistic subtype may differentiate manipulation tactic choice. Therapeutic contexts could consider focusing on manipulative behaviors in terms of narcissistic subtypes when planning interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Psychology
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2026.2723900
Primary Topic
Personality Traits and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism as predictors of manipulation tactics

Gert H. J. Kruger, Lawrence Kruger
Cogent Psychology
Personality Traits and Psychology
article

Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism as predictors of manipulation tactics

Gert H. J. Kruger, Lawrence Kruger
article en

Abstract

Narcissism is associated with the manipulation of interpersonal encounters to fulfil specific interpersonal needs. Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism are driven by different interpersonal needs, yet it is unclear whether these differences appear in their manipulation tactics. The current study examined whether grandiose and vulnerable narcissism differ in their associations with Buss’s (Citation1992, Journal of Personality, 60(2), 477–499) twelve manipulation tactics. A sample of 280 undergraduate students completed the Pathological Narcissism Inventory and the Tactics of Manipulation scale. Structural equation modelling was employed in two stages, with a full exploratory model examining associations across all tactics, followed by a trimmed model retaining only significant paths (CFI = 0.993, SRMR = 0.041). Grandiose narcissism was associated with ten of the 12 tactics in the trimmed model, largely at small-to-moderate effect sizes, whereas three tactics related to vulnerable narcissism. Using Jonason and Webster (Citation2012, Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 521–526) protean approach as a theoretical context, it is suggested that grandiose narcissism’s approach motivation aligns with tactics oriented towards status and dominance. Vulnerable narcissism’s rejection sensitivity and avoidance approach support the use of lower risk tactics. The findings indicate that narcissistic subtype may differentiate manipulation tactic choice. Therapeutic contexts could consider focusing on manipulative behaviors in terms of narcissistic subtypes when planning interventions.

Cogent PsychologyVol. 13(1)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Personality Traits and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.