Party and Prejudice: Are Asian American Candidates Better Suited to Win in White Districts?

ABSTRACT Recent work on Asian American descriptive representation has found that Asian American officeholders are more prevalent in racially diverse districts when compared to Black or Latino representatives, but still face substantial obstacles in very white electoral districts. This work, however, models Asian American representation by observing officeholders only, ignoring both the competitive election environment and Asian American losing candidates, biasing its inferences. We reassess these conclusions using a candidate‐centered approach in thousands of state legislative races in 2018 and 2020. Our results demonstrate that Asian American, Black, and Latino candidates all perform substantially better in white districts than officeholder models predict, and that any differences between minority groups in white districts are due to the partisan match between candidates and their districts. The findings speak to the need for researchers to model vote choice as a candidate‐centered process, paying careful attention to the actual choices on voters' election day ballots.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70092
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Party and Prejudice: Are Asian American Candidates Better Suited to Win in White Districts?

Paru R. Shah, Bernard L. Fraga, Eric Gonzalez Juenke
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Party and Prejudice: Are Asian American Candidates Better Suited to Win in White Districts?

Paru R. Shah, Bernard L. Fraga, Eric Gonzalez Juenke
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent work on Asian American descriptive representation has found that Asian American officeholders are more prevalent in racially diverse districts when compared to Black or Latino representatives, but still face substantial obstacles in very white electoral districts. This work, however, models Asian American representation by observing officeholders only, ignoring both the competitive election environment and Asian American losing candidates, biasing its inferences. We reassess these conclusions using a candidate‐centered approach in thousands of state legislative races in 2018 and 2020. Our results demonstrate that Asian American, Black, and Latino candidates all perform substantially better in white districts than officeholder models predict, and that any differences between minority groups in white districts are due to the partisan match between candidates and their districts. The findings speak to the need for researchers to model vote choice as a candidate‐centered process, paying careful attention to the actual choices on voters' election day ballots.

Legislative Studies QuarterlyVol. 51(4)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Emory University (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Party and Prejudice: Are Asian American Candidates Better Suited to Win in White Districts? — Paru R. Shah, Bernard L. Fraga, et al. · Legislative Studies Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS