A dual-cubic proof of the four-point hyperbolic Atiyah conjecture

The hyperbolic Atiyah conjecture assigns a binary form of degree n-1 to each point of an n-point configuration in hyperbolic three-space and asserts that the resulting forms are linearly independent. We give a complete geometric proof for four points. Starting from Malkoun's dual-cubic reduction, we exclude repeated roots by extremal arguments and use a function that is monotone along hyperbolic geodesics to show that any hypothetical dependence forces the configuration into one totallygeodesic plane. Direct arguments for collinear, concave, and convex configurations then complete the proof. The planar arguments give a self-contained treatment of previously established cases. We also identify an incorrect circular-domain assertion in Malkoun's published proof and give an explicit counterexample to that assertion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23189210
Primary Topic
Mathematics and Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A dual-cubic proof of the four-point hyperbolic Atiyah conjecture

Hu Tan, Ying Zhang, Jiming Ma, Yingjie Lyu
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mathematics and Applications
preprint

A dual-cubic proof of the four-point hyperbolic Atiyah conjecture

Hu Tan, Ying Zhang, Jiming Ma, Yingjie Lyu
preprint en

Abstract

The hyperbolic Atiyah conjecture assigns a binary form of degree n-1 to each point of an n-point configuration in hyperbolic three-space and asserts that the resulting forms are linearly independent. We give a complete geometric proof for four points. Starting from Malkoun's dual-cubic reduction, we exclude repeated roots by extremal arguments and use a function that is monotone along hyperbolic geodesics to show that any hypothetical dependence forces the configuration into one totallygeodesic plane. Direct arguments for collinear, concave, and convex configurations then complete the proof. The planar arguments give a self-contained treatment of previously established cases. We also identify an incorrect circular-domain assertion in Malkoun's published proof and give an explicit counterexample to that assertion.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Fudan University (CN), Soochow University (CN)
Mathematics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.