Reconfiguring inclusion beyond neoliberal capture

This paper presents a critical analysis of the UK policy guidance: The Equality Act 2010 and Schools. This policy guidance is a central (and centralised) feature of England’s attempts at inclusive education, founded on the notion of certain determinate characteristics, such as race, religion, disability, etc. It is argued here that this limits the possibilities for inclusion through opaquely determining what it is to be human and – for those with protected characteristics – less than human. This paper therefore foregrounds posthumanism as a response to the convergence of basic anti-discrimination law with disciplinary inclusion, arguing that inclusion needs to be reconfigured locally as a democratic and emancipatory ethico-onto-epistemological project that recognises the embodied, entangled and relational as an alternative to disembodied human capital formation. This paper looks to motivate the thinking of school leaders and practitioners in terms of how institutional inclusion informed by posthumanism could be developed; one that moves beyond the individualised, ahistorical and decontextualised person of bounded protected characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Inclusive Education
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2026.2740701
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconfiguring inclusion beyond neoliberal capture

Mathew Barnard
International Journal of Inclusive Education
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

Reconfiguring inclusion beyond neoliberal capture

Mathew Barnard
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a critical analysis of the UK policy guidance: The Equality Act 2010 and Schools. This policy guidance is a central (and centralised) feature of England’s attempts at inclusive education, founded on the notion of certain determinate characteristics, such as race, religion, disability, etc. It is argued here that this limits the possibilities for inclusion through opaquely determining what it is to be human and – for those with protected characteristics – less than human. This paper therefore foregrounds posthumanism as a response to the convergence of basic anti-discrimination law with disciplinary inclusion, arguing that inclusion needs to be reconfigured locally as a democratic and emancipatory ethico-onto-epistemological project that recognises the embodied, entangled and relational as an alternative to disembodied human capital formation. This paper looks to motivate the thinking of school leaders and practitioners in terms of how institutional inclusion informed by posthumanism could be developed; one that moves beyond the individualised, ahistorical and decontextualised person of bounded protected characteristics.

International Journal of Inclusive Education
Keele University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reconfiguring inclusion beyond neoliberal capture — Mathew Barnard · International Journal of Inclusive Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS