Biotic and abiotic drivers of ecosystem functioning differ between a temperate and a tropical region

Any single ecosystem will provide many ecosystem functions. Yet, we lack large‐scale, systematic studies of how abiotic factors can directly or indirectly – via effects on biodiversity – drive ecosystem functioning. In this study, we assessed the impact of climate, landscape and biotic community on ecosystem functioning in the temperate and tropical zone, with potential trade‐offs among ecosystem functions in both zones. To this aim, we measured a diverse set of insect‐related functions – including herbivory, seed dispersal, predation, decomposition and pollination – at 50 sites across Madagascar and 171 sites across Sweden, while characterizing the insect community at each site. For the temperate zone, we found that abiotic factors were most important in driving ecosystem functioning, while in the tropical zone, effects of biotic drivers were most pronounced. In the temperate zone, most functions were uncorrelated, but in the tropical zone, most ecosystem functions increased in concert. Our study suggests that the functioning of temperate and tropical ecosystems differs fundamentally in terms of patterns and drivers. To identify global patterns and drivers of ecosystem functioning, and to predict future ecosystem functioning, we next need further replication across biomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecography
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.08108
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biotic and abiotic drivers of ecosystem functioning differ between a temperate and a tropical region

Eric Tsiriniaina Rajoelison, Emma Rova, Ayco J. M. Tack, Tomas V. Roslin et al.
Ecography
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

Biotic and abiotic drivers of ecosystem functioning differ between a temperate and a tropical region

Eric Tsiriniaina Rajoelison, Emma Rova, Ayco J. M. Tack, Tomas V. Roslin, Brian Lee Fisher, David Åhlén, Andreia Miraldo, Laura J. A. van Dijk, Piotr Łukasik, Robert M. Goodsell, Ela Iwaszkiewicz-Eggebrecht, Dimby Raharinjanahary, Johanna Högvall, Erika Lundberg, Fredrik Ronquist
article en

Abstract

Any single ecosystem will provide many ecosystem functions. Yet, we lack large‐scale, systematic studies of how abiotic factors can directly or indirectly – via effects on biodiversity – drive ecosystem functioning. In this study, we assessed the impact of climate, landscape and biotic community on ecosystem functioning in the temperate and tropical zone, with potential trade‐offs among ecosystem functions in both zones. To this aim, we measured a diverse set of insect‐related functions – including herbivory, seed dispersal, predation, decomposition and pollination – at 50 sites across Madagascar and 171 sites across Sweden, while characterizing the insect community at each site. For the temperate zone, we found that abiotic factors were most important in driving ecosystem functioning, while in the tropical zone, effects of biotic drivers were most pronounced. In the temperate zone, most functions were uncorrelated, but in the tropical zone, most ecosystem functions increased in concert. Our study suggests that the functioning of temperate and tropical ecosystems differs fundamentally in terms of patterns and drivers. To identify global patterns and drivers of ecosystem functioning, and to predict future ecosystem functioning, we next need further replication across biomes.

Ecography
Jagiellonian University (PL), University of Helsinki (FI), Stockholm University (SE), Swedish Museum of Natural History (SE), Tsimbazaza Zoo (MG), California Academy of Sciences (US), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.