A μ^{9/2} log μ upper bound for windowed Weil forms

Let λmin(λ) be the bottom of the spectrum of Weil's quadratic form restricted to test functions supported in the multiplicative window [λ−1,λ], and put μ=λ2. By Weil's criterion, the Riemann Hypothesis is equivalent to λmin(λ) ≥ 0 for all λ. In previous papers we proved, without any hypothesis on the zeros of ζ, that λmin(λ) ≤ 1.437×1023 μ9/2(log μ)4e−4πμ for 50 ≤ μ ≤ 104. We locate the sources of the four logarithms: one is the density of the zeros of ζ at height ≈ μ, the other three are artefacts, removed by a translation in a Sobolev step and by keeping the exact Prüfer phase of the prolate functions and estimating a Poisson sum in L2 by non-stationary phase. We prove, unconditionally, λmin(λ) ≤ 3.50×1024 μ9/2 log μ e−4πμ for 50 ≤ μ ≤ 104, and λmin(λ) ≤ 7.58×1024 μ5(log μ)3e−4πμ for all μ ≥ 50. Numerical Galerkin computations of the even part at integer 7 ≤ μ ≤ 20 give ratios λmin/(1−λ4(2πμ)) between about 4.1 and 5.4 (not certified). The results are upper bounds only and say nothing about positivity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23175060
Primary Topic
Analytic Number Theory Research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A μ^{9/2} log μ upper bound for windowed Weil forms

Ryota Mori
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Analytic Number Theory Research
preprint

A μ^{9/2} log μ upper bound for windowed Weil forms

Ryota Mori
preprint en

Abstract

Let λmin(λ) be the bottom of the spectrum of Weil's quadratic form restricted to test functions supported in the multiplicative window [λ−1,λ], and put μ=λ2. By Weil's criterion, the Riemann Hypothesis is equivalent to λmin(λ) ≥ 0 for all λ. In previous papers we proved, without any hypothesis on the zeros of ζ, that λmin(λ) ≤ 1.437×1023 μ9/2(log μ)4e−4πμ for 50 ≤ μ ≤ 104. We locate the sources of the four logarithms: one is the density of the zeros of ζ at height ≈ μ, the other three are artefacts, removed by a translation in a Sobolev step and by keeping the exact Prüfer phase of the prolate functions and estimating a Poisson sum in L2 by non-stationary phase. We prove, unconditionally, λmin(λ) ≤ 3.50×1024 μ9/2 log μ e−4πμ for 50 ≤ μ ≤ 104, and λmin(λ) ≤ 7.58×1024 μ5(log μ)3e−4πμ for all μ ≥ 50. Numerical Galerkin computations of the even part at integer 7 ≤ μ ≤ 20 give ratios λmin/(1−λ4(2πμ)) between about 4.1 and 5.4 (not certified). The results are upper bounds only and say nothing about positivity.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Analytic Number Theory Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.