Crime and Participation

Does exposure to crime mobilize or demobilize political participation? We report findings from a preregistered design, leveraging data from an original survey of 21 major U.S. cities and five waves of the Cooperative Election Study. We assess the relationships between direct victimization, local (ZCTA-level) crime rates, and perceived neighborhood safety and two outcomes: turnout (including validated turnout) and non-electoral participation. We find that direct victimization is significantly associated with more non-electoral engagement but lower turnout. The negative estimated effects of victimization on turnout exceed the magnitude of positive effects associated with common get-out-the-vote efforts. We find only limited evidence that crime rates are associated with participation. Perceived neighborhood safety is associated with higher rates of non-electoral, but not electoral, participation. Our findings offer new, comprehensive evidence on the relationship between crime exposure and political participation and illustrate the importance of distinguishing between types of exposure and forms of participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Political Science Review
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055426102007
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crime and Participation

Dana Garbarski, G. Agustin Markarian, Mena C. R. Whalen, David Doherty
American Political Science Review
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Crime and Participation

Dana Garbarski, G. Agustin Markarian, Mena C. R. Whalen, David Doherty
article en

Abstract

Does exposure to crime mobilize or demobilize political participation? We report findings from a preregistered design, leveraging data from an original survey of 21 major U.S. cities and five waves of the Cooperative Election Study. We assess the relationships between direct victimization, local (ZCTA-level) crime rates, and perceived neighborhood safety and two outcomes: turnout (including validated turnout) and non-electoral participation. We find that direct victimization is significantly associated with more non-electoral engagement but lower turnout. The negative estimated effects of victimization on turnout exceed the magnitude of positive effects associated with common get-out-the-vote efforts. We find only limited evidence that crime rates are associated with participation. Perceived neighborhood safety is associated with higher rates of non-electoral, but not electoral, participation. Our findings offer new, comprehensive evidence on the relationship between crime exposure and political participation and illustrate the importance of distinguishing between types of exposure and forms of participation.

American Political Science Review
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.