Prognostic Significance of p53 Immunohistochemical Expression and Molecular Characterization of TP53 Variants in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Background: The prognostic significance of p53 immunohistochemical expression in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains controversial, particularly following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The relationship between p53 immunohistochemical expression, TP53 sequence variants, and clinical outcome following neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains incompletely understood. This study evaluated the relationship between p53 expression, TP53 variant profiles, longitudinal changes in TP53 variant detection and allele frequency, and clinical outcome in patients with TNBC treated with NAC. Methods: Forty-three patients with TNBC treated with NAC were retrospectively analyzed. p53 immunohistochemistry performed on tumor samples collected before NAC was evaluated using binary (<10% vs. ≥10%) and three-tier (<10%, 10–50%, >50%) classifications. We performed targeted sequencing on tumors before treatment and available matched post-treatment samples to characterize TP53 variants and longitudinal changes in variant detection and variant allele frequency (VAF). We assessed associations with pathological complete response (pCR), recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: High p53 expression assessed before NAC (≥10%) was significantly associated with improved DFS and OS among patients achieving pCR, whereas no significant prognostic association was observed in patients with residual disease. This differential association according to pathological response was supported by formal interaction analyses. TP53 variant status and baseline variant burden were not significantly associated with clinical outcome, and patient-level TP53 VAF did not significantly differ among prognostic groups. Longitudinal TP53 sequencing identified shared and timepoint-specific variants and changes in VAF between baseline and post-treatment samples. These molecular findings were considered exploratory and descriptive. Conclusions: p53 immunohistochemical expression assessed before NAC showed prognostic associations that differed according to pathological response, whereas TP53 sequencing provided descriptive molecular characterization and did not demonstrate independent prognostic stratification. These findings support further investigation of p53 IHC as a potential response-contextual prognostic marker and provide exploratory insight into longitudinal changes in TP53 variant detection and VAF following NAC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16193229
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Significance of p53 Immunohistochemical Expression and Molecular Characterization of TP53 Variants in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Irene Tadeo, Joan Climent, Antonio Falcó, Antonella Locascio et al.
Diagnostics
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Prognostic Significance of p53 Immunohistochemical Expression and Molecular Characterization of TP53 Variants in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Irene Tadeo, Joan Climent, Antonio Falcó, Antonella Locascio, Juan Pardo, Julia Sierra-Roca, Raquel Bosch-Romeu, Juan Ramón Berenguer-Marí, Juan Manuel Gasent-Blesa, Juan Bautista Laforga, Luis Álvarez
article en

Abstract

Background: The prognostic significance of p53 immunohistochemical expression in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains controversial, particularly following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The relationship between p53 immunohistochemical expression, TP53 sequence variants, and clinical outcome following neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains incompletely understood. This study evaluated the relationship between p53 expression, TP53 variant profiles, longitudinal changes in TP53 variant detection and allele frequency, and clinical outcome in patients with TNBC treated with NAC. Methods: Forty-three patients with TNBC treated with NAC were retrospectively analyzed. p53 immunohistochemistry performed on tumor samples collected before NAC was evaluated using binary (<10% vs. ≥10%) and three-tier (<10%, 10–50%, >50%) classifications. We performed targeted sequencing on tumors before treatment and available matched post-treatment samples to characterize TP53 variants and longitudinal changes in variant detection and variant allele frequency (VAF). We assessed associations with pathological complete response (pCR), recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: High p53 expression assessed before NAC (≥10%) was significantly associated with improved DFS and OS among patients achieving pCR, whereas no significant prognostic association was observed in patients with residual disease. This differential association according to pathological response was supported by formal interaction analyses. TP53 variant status and baseline variant burden were not significantly associated with clinical outcome, and patient-level TP53 VAF did not significantly differ among prognostic groups. Longitudinal TP53 sequencing identified shared and timepoint-specific variants and changes in VAF between baseline and post-treatment samples. These molecular findings were considered exploratory and descriptive. Conclusions: p53 immunohistochemical expression assessed before NAC showed prognostic associations that differed according to pathological response, whereas TP53 sequencing provided descriptive molecular characterization and did not demonstrate independent prognostic stratification. These findings support further investigation of p53 IHC as a potential response-contextual prognostic marker and provide exploratory insight into longitudinal changes in TP53 variant detection and VAF following NAC.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(19)
Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.