Oral Stimulation for Supporting the Rooting-Sucking Reflex in Low Birth Weight Infants: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Background & Objective: Children with a history of Low Birth Weight (LBW) are at greater risk of undernutrition compared to those without such a history. This vulnerability is associated with incomplete organ development and weakened immune systems, making them more susceptible to infectious diseases. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of oral stimulation in improving the sucking reflex in LBW infants.Materials & Methods: A quasi-experimental design with pre-test and post-test control groups was conducted involving 25 infants diagnosed with LBW. The intervention consisted of oral stimulation with one finger for 5 minutes followed by 1 minute of breastfeeding in the intervention group, while the control group received standard Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) unit procedures. Oral stimulation was administered twice daily for 14 days, with permission to continue beyond this period. Reflex assessment was then performed. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used for statistical analysis.Results: Baseline characteristics indicated that most infants were preterm (66%), classified as LBW (72%), and male (62%). Statistical analysis revealed significant improvement in the sucking reflex in both the intervention group (P<0.001) and the control group (P=0.001). However, the intervention group demonstrated a higher post-test mean score (1.25) compared to the control group (0.73). Comparison of Post-Test Sucking Reflex Scores yielded a p-value of 0.002, indicating a significant difference between groups.Conclusion: Oral stimulation effectively enhances the rooting-sucking reflex in LBW infants. These findings suggest that periodic oral stimulation can be implemented to support the rooting-sucking reflex in this vulnerable population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Cancer Research
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24200/jogcr.11.12.1186
Primary Topic
Infant Development and Preterm Care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral Stimulation for Supporting the Rooting-Sucking Reflex in Low Birth Weight Infants: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Parida Hanum, Kristina L Silalahi, Debi Novita Siregar, Seri Wahyuni Harahap et al.
Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Cancer Research
Infant Development and Preterm Care
article

Oral Stimulation for Supporting the Rooting-Sucking Reflex in Low Birth Weight Infants: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Parida Hanum, Kristina L Silalahi, Debi Novita Siregar, Seri Wahyuni Harahap, Afeus Halawa, Robin Ferdiansyah Sitopu, Siti Arofah Siregar, Basri Basri
article en

Abstract

Background & Objective: Children with a history of Low Birth Weight (LBW) are at greater risk of undernutrition compared to those without such a history. This vulnerability is associated with incomplete organ development and weakened immune systems, making them more susceptible to infectious diseases. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of oral stimulation in improving the sucking reflex in LBW infants.Materials & Methods: A quasi-experimental design with pre-test and post-test control groups was conducted involving 25 infants diagnosed with LBW. The intervention consisted of oral stimulation with one finger for 5 minutes followed by 1 minute of breastfeeding in the intervention group, while the control group received standard Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) unit procedures. Oral stimulation was administered twice daily for 14 days, with permission to continue beyond this period. Reflex assessment was then performed. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used for statistical analysis.Results: Baseline characteristics indicated that most infants were preterm (66%), classified as LBW (72%), and male (62%). Statistical analysis revealed significant improvement in the sucking reflex in both the intervention group (P<0.001) and the control group (P=0.001). However, the intervention group demonstrated a higher post-test mean score (1.25) compared to the control group (0.73). Comparison of Post-Test Sucking Reflex Scores yielded a p-value of 0.002, indicating a significant difference between groups.Conclusion: Oral stimulation effectively enhances the rooting-sucking reflex in LBW infants. These findings suggest that periodic oral stimulation can be implemented to support the rooting-sucking reflex in this vulnerable population.

Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Cancer ResearchVol. 11(12)
Universitas Prima Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Infant Development and Preterm Care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.