Policy learning and democracy aid in the EU’s Southern Neighbourhood

Abstract The EU has continued to use aid to support democracy in its Southern Neighbourhood, despite deepening authoritarianism in the region since the Arab Uprisings. The democracy narrative remains prominent in EU policy documents and the EU has continued to fund democracy programmes in Southern Neighbourhood countries. This raises the questions of what EU policymakers have learned about democracy aid, and why they consider it worthwhile to continue financing democracy support even as aid has become more securitised. We adapt the policy learning framework developed in this special issue to outline who learns, how they learn and manage knowledge, and how that knowledge is translated into decision-making on EU democracy aid. Empirically, we discuss what the EU has learned from research, reports and evaluations on democracy aid, and we analyse data from the OECD-DAC on EU democracy support to Southern Neighbourhood countries. We argue that policy learning contributed to a pattern of ‘successful failure’, enabling the EU to sustain and adapt democracy aid despite its limited success in promoting democratic change. This is evident in a marked shift in emphasis from direct, ‘political’ democracy aid to indirect, ‘developmental’ democracy aid.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Politics
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-026-00819-9
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy learning and democracy aid in the EU’s Southern Neighbourhood

Mark Furness, Thilo Bodenstein
International Politics
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

Policy learning and democracy aid in the EU’s Southern Neighbourhood

Mark Furness, Thilo Bodenstein
article en

Abstract

Abstract The EU has continued to use aid to support democracy in its Southern Neighbourhood, despite deepening authoritarianism in the region since the Arab Uprisings. The democracy narrative remains prominent in EU policy documents and the EU has continued to fund democracy programmes in Southern Neighbourhood countries. This raises the questions of what EU policymakers have learned about democracy aid, and why they consider it worthwhile to continue financing democracy support even as aid has become more securitised. We adapt the policy learning framework developed in this special issue to outline who learns, how they learn and manage knowledge, and how that knowledge is translated into decision-making on EU democracy aid. Empirically, we discuss what the EU has learned from research, reports and evaluations on democracy aid, and we analyse data from the OECD-DAC on EU democracy support to Southern Neighbourhood countries. We argue that policy learning contributed to a pattern of ‘successful failure’, enabling the EU to sustain and adapt democracy aid despite its limited success in promoting democratic change. This is evident in a marked shift in emphasis from direct, ‘political’ democracy aid to indirect, ‘developmental’ democracy aid.

International Politics
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.