Bridging the green gap through understanding the role of perceived risks in sustainable consumption decisions

Despite growing environmental awareness and positive attitudes toward green products, a significant gap persists between consumers’ intentions and their actual sustainable purchase behavior. This study investigates how perceived risks contribute to this “green gap” by identifying, categorizing, and prioritizing the risk factors that hinder sustainable consumption decisions. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research combined systematic literature review, expert interviews (n = 9), and thematic analysis to identify 21 perceived risk factors. A structured questionnaire was administered to 642 consumers in Iran, and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) revealed four underlying dimensions: Personal Factors, Information and Trust, Environmental Assurance, and Quality Expectations and Purchase Value. Subsequently, the Random Forest algorithm prioritized the risk factors, identifying “Internal failure feeling,” “Unreliable information,” “Brand distrust,” “Additional effort,” “Low variety and not being fashionable,” and “Lack of reliable organizations and certifications” as the six most influential barriers. The findings extend perceived risk theory to the green product context and offer practical implications for policymakers, marketers, and manufacturers seeking to bridge the green gap by addressing these multidimensional risks. This study introduces ‘internal failure feeling’ as a novel risk construct in green product consumption and demonstrates the application of the Random Forest algorithm for risk prioritization, offering a methodological contribution to consumer behavior research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04767-5
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the green gap through understanding the role of perceived risks in sustainable consumption decisions

Reza Molavi, Yaser Sobhanifard
Discover Sustainability
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Bridging the green gap through understanding the role of perceived risks in sustainable consumption decisions

Reza Molavi, Yaser Sobhanifard
article en

Abstract

Despite growing environmental awareness and positive attitudes toward green products, a significant gap persists between consumers’ intentions and their actual sustainable purchase behavior. This study investigates how perceived risks contribute to this “green gap” by identifying, categorizing, and prioritizing the risk factors that hinder sustainable consumption decisions. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research combined systematic literature review, expert interviews (n = 9), and thematic analysis to identify 21 perceived risk factors. A structured questionnaire was administered to 642 consumers in Iran, and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) revealed four underlying dimensions: Personal Factors, Information and Trust, Environmental Assurance, and Quality Expectations and Purchase Value. Subsequently, the Random Forest algorithm prioritized the risk factors, identifying “Internal failure feeling,” “Unreliable information,” “Brand distrust,” “Additional effort,” “Low variety and not being fashionable,” and “Lack of reliable organizations and certifications” as the six most influential barriers. The findings extend perceived risk theory to the green product context and offer practical implications for policymakers, marketers, and manufacturers seeking to bridge the green gap by addressing these multidimensional risks. This study introduces ‘internal failure feeling’ as a novel risk construct in green product consumption and demonstrates the application of the Random Forest algorithm for risk prioritization, offering a methodological contribution to consumer behavior research.

Discover Sustainability
Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.