FIRST-VOID URINE VERSUS URETHRAL SWAB FOR MOLECULAR DETECTION OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS IN MEN WITH MULTIPLE SEXUAL PARTNERS.

BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infections remain a major clinical and global public health burden. Nucleic acid amplification tests are recommended for the molecular detection of urogenital sexually transmitted infections. Although physician-collected urethral swabs have traditionally been used for STI testing in men, swab collection is invasive and may cause substantial discomfort. First-void urine is a promising non-invasive alternative that can support molecular STI testing and screening in men. AIM OF STUDY: To compare first-void urine with physician-collected urethral swab specimens for PCR-based detection of sexually transmitted infections in men with multiple sexual partners. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective paired specimen-comparison study included 148 men aged 22-49 years. Urethral swabs were collected first by a physician, followed by the collection of the initial 20-30 mL of first-void urine. PCR testing targeted Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Paired results were analyzed using exact McNemar tests and Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: At least one STI pathogen was detected in 128 of 148 men (86.5%). First-void urine detected at least one pathogen in 128 participants, whereas the urethral swab detected at least one pathogen in 100 participants. All 28 participant-level discordant results were first-void urine-positive/urethral swab-negative (p<0.001). First-void urine yielded higher detection for C. trachomatis (43 vs 38; p=0.063), N. gonorrhoeae (55 vs 45; p=0.002), and M. genitalium (75 vs 62; p=0.0002). T. vaginalis detection was identical in both specimens (27 vs 27). CONCLUSIONS: First-void urine demonstrated equal or higher molecular detection yield than urethral swab for all four STI pathogens studied, supporting its use as a practical specimen for molecular STI testing in men with multiple sexual partners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-10-04
Primary Topic
Reproductive tract infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FIRST-VOID URINE VERSUS URETHRAL SWAB FOR MOLECULAR DETECTION OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS IN MEN WITH MULTIPLE SEXUAL PARTNERS.

G Durglishvili, K Tsomaia, L Svanadze, D Shishniashvili et al.
PubMed
Reproductive tract infections research
article

FIRST-VOID URINE VERSUS URETHRAL SWAB FOR MOLECULAR DETECTION OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS IN MEN WITH MULTIPLE SEXUAL PARTNERS.

G Durglishvili, K Tsomaia, L Svanadze, D Shishniashvili, Z Bedinashvili, N Chkhikvishvili
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infections remain a major clinical and global public health burden. Nucleic acid amplification tests are recommended for the molecular detection of urogenital sexually transmitted infections. Although physician-collected urethral swabs have traditionally been used for STI testing in men, swab collection is invasive and may cause substantial discomfort. First-void urine is a promising non-invasive alternative that can support molecular STI testing and screening in men. AIM OF STUDY: To compare first-void urine with physician-collected urethral swab specimens for PCR-based detection of sexually transmitted infections in men with multiple sexual partners. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective paired specimen-comparison study included 148 men aged 22-49 years. Urethral swabs were collected first by a physician, followed by the collection of the initial 20-30 mL of first-void urine. PCR testing targeted Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Paired results were analyzed using exact McNemar tests and Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: At least one STI pathogen was detected in 128 of 148 men (86.5%). First-void urine detected at least one pathogen in 128 participants, whereas the urethral swab detected at least one pathogen in 100 participants. All 28 participant-level discordant results were first-void urine-positive/urethral swab-negative (p<0.001). First-void urine yielded higher detection for C. trachomatis (43 vs 38; p=0.063), N. gonorrhoeae (55 vs 45; p=0.002), and M. genitalium (75 vs 62; p=0.0002). T. vaginalis detection was identical in both specimens (27 vs 27). CONCLUSIONS: First-void urine demonstrated equal or higher molecular detection yield than urethral swab for all four STI pathogens studied, supporting its use as a practical specimen for molecular STI testing in men with multiple sexual partners.

PubMed(376-377)
Tbilisi State University (GE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Reproductive tract infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

FIRST-VOID URINE VERSUS URETHRAL SWAB FOR MOLECULAR DETECTION OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS IN MEN WITH MULTIPLE SEXUAL PARTNERS. — G Durglishvili, K Tsomaia, et al. · PubMed (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS