Differential diagnostic value of PAX1 and JAM3 methylation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia between premenopausal and postmenopausal women: a retrospective clinical study in China

Background PAX1/JAM3 methylation are promising biomarkers for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) detection, but menopausal status may affect diagnostic accuracy. This retrospective study compared their clinical performance between premenopausal and postmenopausal women undergoing colposcopy.Methods 705 women undergoing colposcopy for abnormal screening results and/or clinical symptoms were stratified by menopausal status, including 192 postmenopausal and 513 premenopausal women. Subjects were further classified into ≤CIN1 and CIN2+ groups according to histopathology. Diagnostic and triage utility of PAX1/JAM3 methylation for identifying CIN2+ lesions were compared between premenopausal and postmenopausal women.Results PAX1/JAM3 methylation demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for CIN2+ detection in postmenopausal women compared with premenopausal women, either alone or in combination. Sensitivities of PAX1m and JAM3m in postmenopausal women (90.00%, 95% CI: 76.34–97.21%; 82.50%, 95% CI: 67.22–92.66%) were higher than those in premenopausal women (61.98%, 95% CI: 52.71–70.65%; 60.33%, 95% CI: 51.04–69.11%) (all p < 0.05). The combination improved sensitivity to 72.73% in premenopausal women and maintained 92.50% in postmenopausal women. Besides, PAX1/JAM3 methylation outperformed cytology and HPV16/18 testing in both groups (p < 0.001). In HPV16/18-positive or cytology triage, methylation increased positive predictive values (PPVs) for CIN2+/CIN3+ and reduced colposcopy referrals . However, CIN2+ missed rates in premenopausal women (27.54% for HPV16/18-positive triage and 23.85% for cytology triage) were higher than those in postmenopausal counterparts.Conclusions The diagnostic performance of PAX1/JAM3 methylation for high-grade cervical lesions differs distinctly between premenopausal and postmenopausal women undergoing colposcopy. Menopausal status should be considered when applying methylation biomarkers, particularly as a valuable auxiliary tool to improve diagnostic accuracy in elderly women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Medicine
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2026.2722566
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential diagnostic value of PAX1 and JAM3 methylation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia between premenopausal and postmenopausal women: a retrospective clinical study in China

陈海迎, Tao Song, Yucheng Lai, Xiaoyan Chen et al.
Annals of Medicine
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Differential diagnostic value of PAX1 and JAM3 methylation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia between premenopausal and postmenopausal women: a retrospective clinical study in China

陈海迎, Tao Song, Yucheng Lai, Xiaoyan Chen, Yan Shen, Peixin Wang, Mengyu Zhang
article en

Abstract

Background PAX1/JAM3 methylation are promising biomarkers for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) detection, but menopausal status may affect diagnostic accuracy. This retrospective study compared their clinical performance between premenopausal and postmenopausal women undergoing colposcopy.Methods 705 women undergoing colposcopy for abnormal screening results and/or clinical symptoms were stratified by menopausal status, including 192 postmenopausal and 513 premenopausal women. Subjects were further classified into ≤CIN1 and CIN2+ groups according to histopathology. Diagnostic and triage utility of PAX1/JAM3 methylation for identifying CIN2+ lesions were compared between premenopausal and postmenopausal women.Results PAX1/JAM3 methylation demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for CIN2+ detection in postmenopausal women compared with premenopausal women, either alone or in combination. Sensitivities of PAX1m and JAM3m in postmenopausal women (90.00%, 95% CI: 76.34–97.21%; 82.50%, 95% CI: 67.22–92.66%) were higher than those in premenopausal women (61.98%, 95% CI: 52.71–70.65%; 60.33%, 95% CI: 51.04–69.11%) (all p < 0.05). The combination improved sensitivity to 72.73% in premenopausal women and maintained 92.50% in postmenopausal women. Besides, PAX1/JAM3 methylation outperformed cytology and HPV16/18 testing in both groups (p < 0.001). In HPV16/18-positive or cytology triage, methylation increased positive predictive values (PPVs) for CIN2+/CIN3+ and reduced colposcopy referrals . However, CIN2+ missed rates in premenopausal women (27.54% for HPV16/18-positive triage and 23.85% for cytology triage) were higher than those in postmenopausal counterparts.Conclusions The diagnostic performance of PAX1/JAM3 methylation for high-grade cervical lesions differs distinctly between premenopausal and postmenopausal women undergoing colposcopy. Menopausal status should be considered when applying methylation biomarkers, particularly as a valuable auxiliary tool to improve diagnostic accuracy in elderly women.

Annals of MedicineVol. 58(1)
Hangzhou Normal University (CN), Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Hangzhou Medical College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.