Facing Allograft Failure: A Systematic Review of Explantation and Retransplantation in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Background: Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) can restore form and function beyond conventional reconstruction, but acute (AR) and chronic rejection (CR) limit long-term allograft survival. When allograft failure becomes irreversible, explantation or retransplantation may be necessary. This review evaluates the indications, management, and operative considerations associated with explantation and retransplantation in VCA. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, PubMed Central, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies reporting patient-level data on VCA recipients who underwent allograft explantation or retransplantation. Extracted data included recipient demographics, immunologic characteristics, rejection history, and explantation or retransplantation outcomes. Results: Nineteen studies reporting 25 VCA recipients were included, comprising 22 explants and three retransplants (two face, one abdominal wall). The most common VCA types were uterus (32%), face (24%), and hand (16%). The leading indications for graft removal were CR (44%), perfusion-related complications (32.0%), medication non-compliance (24.0%), and patient request (12.0%). The median time to explant was 12.5 months, and to retransplant was 7.3 years. Management of CR included pulse steroids, increased immunosuppression, plasmapheresis, and biologic agents. Retransplantation was more technically challenging than the primary transplant due to scarring, distorted anatomy, and vessels affected by CR, requiring more proximal vascular anastomoses and nerve coaptations. Conclusion: Explantation and retransplantation in VCA are feasible but last-line interventions. The leading cause of graft loss was CR, though perfusion-related and patient-related factors also contributed. Earlier recognition and management of AR, clearer definitions of CR, and overall improved strategies to prevent progression to irreversible graft failure are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2972-6379
Primary Topic
Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facing Allograft Failure: A Systematic Review of Explantation and Retransplantation in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Alexis K. Gursky, Heather Wyatt, Bruce E. Gelb, Eduardo D. Rodriguez et al.
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
article

Facing Allograft Failure: A Systematic Review of Explantation and Retransplantation in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Alexis K. Gursky, Heather Wyatt, Bruce E. Gelb, Eduardo D. Rodriguez, Daniel J. Ceradini, Sergio Andres Segrera, Y. Edward Wen, Shaina M Staffenberg, Anandhini D Narayanan
article en

Abstract

Background: Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) can restore form and function beyond conventional reconstruction, but acute (AR) and chronic rejection (CR) limit long-term allograft survival. When allograft failure becomes irreversible, explantation or retransplantation may be necessary. This review evaluates the indications, management, and operative considerations associated with explantation and retransplantation in VCA. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, PubMed Central, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies reporting patient-level data on VCA recipients who underwent allograft explantation or retransplantation. Extracted data included recipient demographics, immunologic characteristics, rejection history, and explantation or retransplantation outcomes. Results: Nineteen studies reporting 25 VCA recipients were included, comprising 22 explants and three retransplants (two face, one abdominal wall). The most common VCA types were uterus (32%), face (24%), and hand (16%). The leading indications for graft removal were CR (44%), perfusion-related complications (32.0%), medication non-compliance (24.0%), and patient request (12.0%). The median time to explant was 12.5 months, and to retransplant was 7.3 years. Management of CR included pulse steroids, increased immunosuppression, plasmapheresis, and biologic agents. Retransplantation was more technically challenging than the primary transplant due to scarring, distorted anatomy, and vessels affected by CR, requiring more proximal vascular anastomoses and nerve coaptations. Conclusion: Explantation and retransplantation in VCA are feasible but last-line interventions. The leading cause of graft loss was CR, though perfusion-related and patient-related factors also contributed. Earlier recognition and management of AR, clearer definitions of CR, and overall improved strategies to prevent progression to irreversible graft failure are needed.

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
NYU Langone Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.