Effects of Object Height and AOI Margins on Gaze Measures in a Tabletop Task

AOI margin and object height affect gaze assignment; this methodological case study separates them. In a block-imitation task by ten participants, we compared, on the same 4798 fixations, the printed working area (object and support), that area plus a 19 mm margin (separately measured gaze error), and that region raised to object height; the last two differ only in height. Height alone raised the copy area’s dwell share in all ten participants (median +2.4 percentage points), as geometry dictates. For the model’s area, whose region starts on the turntable and can lose gaze, the median was +0.4 points (−5.7 to +32.0), with five rising and five falling. In this layout, the margin moved medians more (copy +7.1, unassigned −14.5). Raised, model and right-tray regions overlapped at every viewpoint; widening them to 40 mm added a median of 0.81 points of assigned time but raised the share qualifying for multiple regions from 0.0% to 13.1%. Two raters judged 200 fixations: the raised region matched their labels more often but also assigned an area where they saw only mat; more assignment is not evidence of accuracy. Size and height are separable choices to report per participant, and their weight depends on layout, tracker and margin.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Eye Movement Research
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr19050114
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Object Height and AOI Margins on Gaze Measures in a Tabletop Task

Yusuke Nagamori, Kazaru Yaegashi, Mika Isobe, Fumika Suzuki et al.
Journal of Eye Movement Research
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
article

Effects of Object Height and AOI Margins on Gaze Measures in a Tabletop Task

Yusuke Nagamori, Kazaru Yaegashi, Mika Isobe, Fumika Suzuki, Yuji Mizoue, Mizuki Nakajima
article en

Abstract

AOI margin and object height affect gaze assignment; this methodological case study separates them. In a block-imitation task by ten participants, we compared, on the same 4798 fixations, the printed working area (object and support), that area plus a 19 mm margin (separately measured gaze error), and that region raised to object height; the last two differ only in height. Height alone raised the copy area’s dwell share in all ten participants (median +2.4 percentage points), as geometry dictates. For the model’s area, whose region starts on the turntable and can lose gaze, the median was +0.4 points (−5.7 to +32.0), with five rising and five falling. In this layout, the margin moved medians more (copy +7.1, unassigned −14.5). Raised, model and right-tray regions overlapped at every viewpoint; widening them to 40 mm added a median of 0.81 points of assigned time but raised the share qualifying for multiple regions from 0.0% to 13.1%. Two raters judged 200 fixations: the raised region matched their labels more often but also assigned an area where they saw only mat; more assignment is not evidence of accuracy. Size and height are separable choices to report per participant, and their weight depends on layout, tracker and margin.

Journal of Eye Movement ResearchVol. 19(5)
Ritsumeikan University (JP), Shibaura Institute of Technology (JP), Tokyo City University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.