Fracture resistance and failure patterns of MOD composite restorations reinforced with InFibra versus ribbond polyethylene fibers: an in vitro comparative study

Abstract Recent advancements in restorative materials, particularly fiber-reinforced composites, have enhanced the reinforcement of weakened teeth and improved their ability to withstand masticatory forces. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of InFibra and Ribbond in MOD cavity restorations by assessing fracture resistance under simulated masticatory loading and analyzing failure patterns. A total of 90 extracted, caries-free human mandibular molars were utilized. Standardized mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared. The teeth were randomly allocated into three groups ( n = 30). Group 1 (control, restored with a bulk-fill composite Jen-Radiance Molar), Group 2 (restored with INFIBRA polyethylene fibers followed by same bulk-fill composite), and Group 3 (restored with RIBBOND polyethylene fibers followed by the same bulk-fill composite. Specimens were thermocycled for a total of 1000 cycles for a 20s. Fracture resistance testing was performed. Fracture patterns were examined under stereomicroscope. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s post hoc test to detect the significance difference between groups ( p = 0.05). Statistically significant differences in fracture resistance were observed among the three groups ( p < 0.001), with a moderate effect size. The Control group exhibited predominantly unfavorable failures (73.33%). In contrast, both the InFibra and Ribbond groups showed significantly higher percentages of favorable failures (80.00% each) compared to the Control group ( p < 0.001 for both). Adhesive failures occurred significantly more frequently in the InFibra and Ribbond (60.00%) groups. Cohesive restoration & substrate failures were significantly more common in the Control group (33.33%). Polyethylene fiber reinforcement did not improve the fracture resistance of mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) composite restorations; however, both systems significantly promoted more favorable, repairable failure patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-71202-0
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fracture resistance and failure patterns of MOD composite restorations reinforced with InFibra versus ribbond polyethylene fibers: an in vitro comparative study

Esraa Esmeail H. Elhaddad, Dina Fayez S. Diab
Scientific Reports
Dental materials and restorations
article

Fracture resistance and failure patterns of MOD composite restorations reinforced with InFibra versus ribbond polyethylene fibers: an in vitro comparative study

Esraa Esmeail H. Elhaddad, Dina Fayez S. Diab
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recent advancements in restorative materials, particularly fiber-reinforced composites, have enhanced the reinforcement of weakened teeth and improved their ability to withstand masticatory forces. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of InFibra and Ribbond in MOD cavity restorations by assessing fracture resistance under simulated masticatory loading and analyzing failure patterns. A total of 90 extracted, caries-free human mandibular molars were utilized. Standardized mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared. The teeth were randomly allocated into three groups ( n = 30). Group 1 (control, restored with a bulk-fill composite Jen-Radiance Molar), Group 2 (restored with INFIBRA polyethylene fibers followed by same bulk-fill composite), and Group 3 (restored with RIBBOND polyethylene fibers followed by the same bulk-fill composite. Specimens were thermocycled for a total of 1000 cycles for a 20s. Fracture resistance testing was performed. Fracture patterns were examined under stereomicroscope. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s post hoc test to detect the significance difference between groups ( p = 0.05). Statistically significant differences in fracture resistance were observed among the three groups ( p < 0.001), with a moderate effect size. The Control group exhibited predominantly unfavorable failures (73.33%). In contrast, both the InFibra and Ribbond groups showed significantly higher percentages of favorable failures (80.00% each) compared to the Control group ( p < 0.001 for both). Adhesive failures occurred significantly more frequently in the InFibra and Ribbond (60.00%) groups. Cohesive restoration & substrate failures were significantly more common in the Control group (33.33%). Polyethylene fiber reinforcement did not improve the fracture resistance of mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) composite restorations; however, both systems significantly promoted more favorable, repairable failure patterns.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Misr University for Science and Technology (EG), Egyptian Russian University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.