Artificial Intelligence, Multi-Omics, and Multimodal Integration in Precision Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: From Biological Insights to Treatment Decisions

Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer must balance disease control against normal-tissue injury. Artificial intelligence (AI), multi-omics, and multimodal analysis offer complementary ways to characterize tumor and host heterogeneity, but their relevance to treatment decisions depends on how measurements, outcomes, and validation are linked. This narrative review examines these approaches across head and neck cancers, with evidence concentrated in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Literature was identified through Web of Science and PubMed searches with targeted supplementary searches and reference-list screening, and selected for relevance to radiotherapy biology, clinical outcomes, and methodological or clinical validation. We distinguish joint molecular or multimodal inputs from parallel analyses and post hoc biological annotation, and assess findings according to population, treatment setting, sampling time, and analytical unit. Genomic, proteogenomic, single-cell, and spatial studies identify candidate phenotypes involving deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair, viral regulation, immunity, and metabolism. Clinical studies examine response, recurrence and survival stratification, molecular surveillance, and toxicity prediction. However, associations with outcomes under observed treatment do not establish differential treatment benefit, and improved discrimination does not demonstrate that model-guided care improves patient outcomes. Small patient cohorts, incomplete assay availability, potential data leakage, and limited independent validation further constrain interpretation. Translation requires reproducible measurements, patient-level validation of complete analytical pipelines, calibrated risk estimates, and evaluation within the intended treatment context. Prospective evaluation should prioritize predefined model-guided strategies and assess disease control, patient-relevant harm, and practical implementation together.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14102252
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence, Multi-Omics, and Multimodal Integration in Precision Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: From Biological Insights to Treatment Decisions

Minglun Li, Miao Rao, Run Shi, Yingjian Wang
Biomedicines
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Artificial Intelligence, Multi-Omics, and Multimodal Integration in Precision Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: From Biological Insights to Treatment Decisions

Minglun Li, Miao Rao, Run Shi, Yingjian Wang
article en

Abstract

Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer must balance disease control against normal-tissue injury. Artificial intelligence (AI), multi-omics, and multimodal analysis offer complementary ways to characterize tumor and host heterogeneity, but their relevance to treatment decisions depends on how measurements, outcomes, and validation are linked. This narrative review examines these approaches across head and neck cancers, with evidence concentrated in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Literature was identified through Web of Science and PubMed searches with targeted supplementary searches and reference-list screening, and selected for relevance to radiotherapy biology, clinical outcomes, and methodological or clinical validation. We distinguish joint molecular or multimodal inputs from parallel analyses and post hoc biological annotation, and assess findings according to population, treatment setting, sampling time, and analytical unit. Genomic, proteogenomic, single-cell, and spatial studies identify candidate phenotypes involving deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair, viral regulation, immunity, and metabolism. Clinical studies examine response, recurrence and survival stratification, molecular surveillance, and toxicity prediction. However, associations with outcomes under observed treatment do not establish differential treatment benefit, and improved discrimination does not demonstrate that model-guided care improves patient outcomes. Small patient cohorts, incomplete assay availability, potential data leakage, and limited independent validation further constrain interpretation. Translation requires reproducible measurements, patient-level validation of complete analytical pipelines, calibrated risk estimates, and evaluation within the intended treatment context. Prospective evaluation should prioritize predefined model-guided strategies and assess disease control, patient-relevant harm, and practical implementation together.

BiomedicinesVol. 14(10)
Guangxi Medical University (CN), Nanjing Brain Hospital (CN), Klinikum Lüneburg (DE), Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.