AI Agents and Corporate Liability: A Comparative Policy Analysis for Business Law Reform in India

Abstract The emergence of autonomous AI agents, which can independently negotiate contracts, conduct financial transactions, manage customer interactions, and make business decisions with minimal human involvement, has ushered in a revolutionary era for Artificial Intelligence (AI). They promise greater efficiency and innovation, but also expose serious gaps in traditional legal doctrines of corporate liability that assume human agency, intention, and control. Recent events such as the Air Canada chatbot litigation, Robodebt in Australia, and Childcare Benefits Scandal in the Netherlands show that autonomous algorithmic decisions can lead to contract disputes, discriminatory outcomes, consumer detriment, financial loss, and institutional failures, raising fundamental questions of corporate accountability and legal responsibility. The paper seeks to critically analyze whether the existing legal framework in India, i.e., the Companies Act, 2013, the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, can deal with the liability arising due to autonomous AI agents making commercial decisions. This study adopts doctrinal, comparative, and policy-oriented legal research methods to examine emerging international regulatory approaches, such as the European Union AI Act, the OECD AI Principles, ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management Systems, and Singapore’s AI Governance Framework, with a view to identifying global best practices for responsible AI governance. The paper argues that traditional fault-based liability is increasingly ill-suited to situations in which artificial intelligence systems independently influence corporate decisions. It proposes a risk-based governance framework requiring AI oversight at the board level, mandatory algorithmic audits, human accountability mechanisms, explainability requirements, and statutory reforms to embed AI governance in Indian business law. The study connects technological innovation to corporate accountability, contributing to the ongoing discussion on responsible AI regulation and offering policy recommendations to build a robust legal ecosystem that supports sustainable economic development in the Industry 5.0 era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23153304
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Agents and Corporate Liability: A Comparative Policy Analysis for Business Law Reform in India

Lokanath Patra
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
article

AI Agents and Corporate Liability: A Comparative Policy Analysis for Business Law Reform in India

Lokanath Patra
article en

Abstract

Abstract The emergence of autonomous AI agents, which can independently negotiate contracts, conduct financial transactions, manage customer interactions, and make business decisions with minimal human involvement, has ushered in a revolutionary era for Artificial Intelligence (AI). They promise greater efficiency and innovation, but also expose serious gaps in traditional legal doctrines of corporate liability that assume human agency, intention, and control. Recent events such as the Air Canada chatbot litigation, Robodebt in Australia, and Childcare Benefits Scandal in the Netherlands show that autonomous algorithmic decisions can lead to contract disputes, discriminatory outcomes, consumer detriment, financial loss, and institutional failures, raising fundamental questions of corporate accountability and legal responsibility. The paper seeks to critically analyze whether the existing legal framework in India, i.e., the Companies Act, 2013, the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, can deal with the liability arising due to autonomous AI agents making commercial decisions. This study adopts doctrinal, comparative, and policy-oriented legal research methods to examine emerging international regulatory approaches, such as the European Union AI Act, the OECD AI Principles, ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management Systems, and Singapore’s AI Governance Framework, with a view to identifying global best practices for responsible AI governance. The paper argues that traditional fault-based liability is increasingly ill-suited to situations in which artificial intelligence systems independently influence corporate decisions. It proposes a risk-based governance framework requiring AI oversight at the board level, mandatory algorithmic audits, human accountability mechanisms, explainability requirements, and statutory reforms to embed AI governance in Indian business law. The study connects technological innovation to corporate accountability, contributing to the ongoing discussion on responsible AI regulation and offering policy recommendations to build a robust legal ecosystem that supports sustainable economic development in the Industry 5.0 era.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Berhampur University (IN)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon