Intertwin Amikacin Exposure in Conjoined Twins: A Therapeutic Drug Monitoring–Informed Coupled Pharmacokinetic Modeling Case Study

Background: Conjoined twins represent a rare condition in which drug exposure may be influenced by shared circulation and organ anatomy. For narrow therapeutic index antimicrobials such as amikacin, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may require interpretation at twin-pair level. Methods: A retrospective TDM-informed coupled compartmental pharmacokinetic modeling study of 2 conjoined twin pairs was performed. One pair was pygopagus, and both twins (A and B) received amikacin treatment. The other pair was thoracopagus (X and Y) with complex shared cardiothoracic anatomy; amikacin was administered to twin X but not to twin Y. Data were reviewed and structured for pharmacokinetic modeling. Amikacin disposition was evaluated using a model incorporating twin-specific disposition and intertwin transfer. Results: The pygopagus twins both received amikacin (35 mg) intravenously every 24 hours, corresponding to approximately 14.2 mg/kg/d. Paired concentrations showed asymmetric exposure despite identical nominal dosing: peak concentrations were 7.7 and 13.1 mg/L, and trough concentrations were 4.0 and 2.7 mg/L in twins A and B, respectively. Twin X received amikacin (85 mg; 15 mg/kg/d) intravenously every 24 hours during the first dosing period, followed by a single dose (83 mg) 3 days later. Approximately 69 hours after the last dose, the concentrations were 5.3/L and 10.9 mg/L in twin X and twin Y, respectively. A no-transfer model predicted no amikacin exposure in twin Y. Representative coupled solutions supported intertwin transfer in the 10 −2 L/h range, and compatible Qtransfer values of approximately 0.016–0.066 L/h were identified, indicating that no single transfer clearance value was uniquely identifiable from the 2 case 2 concentrations. Conclusions: This analysis illustrates how paired TDM and a literature-anchored coupled compartmental pharmacokinetic model can support drug exposure interpretation in exceptional clinical settings where conventional modeling is not feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0000000000001530
Primary Topic
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intertwin Amikacin Exposure in Conjoined Twins: A Therapeutic Drug Monitoring–Informed Coupled Pharmacokinetic Modeling Case Study

Hülya Tezel Yalçın, Nadir Yalçın, İrem İyigün, Karel Allegaert et al.
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
article

Intertwin Amikacin Exposure in Conjoined Twins: A Therapeutic Drug Monitoring–Informed Coupled Pharmacokinetic Modeling Case Study

Hülya Tezel Yalçın, Nadir Yalçın, İrem İyigün, Karel Allegaert, Hasan Tolga Çelik
article en

Abstract

Background: Conjoined twins represent a rare condition in which drug exposure may be influenced by shared circulation and organ anatomy. For narrow therapeutic index antimicrobials such as amikacin, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may require interpretation at twin-pair level. Methods: A retrospective TDM-informed coupled compartmental pharmacokinetic modeling study of 2 conjoined twin pairs was performed. One pair was pygopagus, and both twins (A and B) received amikacin treatment. The other pair was thoracopagus (X and Y) with complex shared cardiothoracic anatomy; amikacin was administered to twin X but not to twin Y. Data were reviewed and structured for pharmacokinetic modeling. Amikacin disposition was evaluated using a model incorporating twin-specific disposition and intertwin transfer. Results: The pygopagus twins both received amikacin (35 mg) intravenously every 24 hours, corresponding to approximately 14.2 mg/kg/d. Paired concentrations showed asymmetric exposure despite identical nominal dosing: peak concentrations were 7.7 and 13.1 mg/L, and trough concentrations were 4.0 and 2.7 mg/L in twins A and B, respectively. Twin X received amikacin (85 mg; 15 mg/kg/d) intravenously every 24 hours during the first dosing period, followed by a single dose (83 mg) 3 days later. Approximately 69 hours after the last dose, the concentrations were 5.3/L and 10.9 mg/L in twin X and twin Y, respectively. A no-transfer model predicted no amikacin exposure in twin Y. Representative coupled solutions supported intertwin transfer in the 10 −2 L/h range, and compatible Qtransfer values of approximately 0.016–0.066 L/h were identified, indicating that no single transfer clearance value was uniquely identifiable from the 2 case 2 concentrations. Conclusions: This analysis illustrates how paired TDM and a literature-anchored coupled compartmental pharmacokinetic model can support drug exposure interpretation in exceptional clinical settings where conventional modeling is not feasible.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Erasmus MC (NL), Hacettepe University (TR), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.