From Strait of Hormuz to KOSPI: sectoral responses of the South Korean stock market to the 2026 Iran strikes

This paper examines how the South Korean stock market responded to the 28 February 2026 U.S.–Israel strikes on Iran, asking whether an oil-supply shock is priced mainly through Korea's status as an oil importer or through firm-level characteristics, particularly in petroleum refining and energy. Using a market-model event study of 784 firms on the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI), we estimate abnormal returns over a 250-day window, with 200-day and 100-day windows for robustness. The event date is 3 March 2026, the first Korean trading day after the strikes. The KOSPI reacted negatively: the CAAR reached −3.75% over [0, +1] and −5.41% over [−5, +5], significant across all specifications. Sectoral heterogeneity was substantial. Consumer discretionary, consumer staples, and healthcare recorded the largest losses, consistent with weaker household purchasing power and demand. Energy firms earned positive abnormal returns, significant under parametric and marginally significant under non-parametric tests, consistent with wider refining margins and inventory revaluation gains. Cross-sectional regressions confirm that oil-sector firms outperformed, with the effect significant absent sector fixed effects and consistently positive throughout. The paper extends the geopolitical literature with a cross-sectional framework distinguishing firm-level oil-exposure effects from sector-level effects, showing how petroleum value-chain structure shapes responses to geopolitical shocks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Economics & Finance
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2026.2740367
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Strait of Hormuz to KOSPI: sectoral responses of the South Korean stock market to the 2026 Iran strikes

Ibraheem T. AlAskar, Ibrahim Naser Khatatbeh, Ahmad Bash
Cogent Economics & Finance
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

From Strait of Hormuz to KOSPI: sectoral responses of the South Korean stock market to the 2026 Iran strikes

Ibraheem T. AlAskar, Ibrahim Naser Khatatbeh, Ahmad Bash
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how the South Korean stock market responded to the 28 February 2026 U.S.–Israel strikes on Iran, asking whether an oil-supply shock is priced mainly through Korea's status as an oil importer or through firm-level characteristics, particularly in petroleum refining and energy. Using a market-model event study of 784 firms on the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI), we estimate abnormal returns over a 250-day window, with 200-day and 100-day windows for robustness. The event date is 3 March 2026, the first Korean trading day after the strikes. The KOSPI reacted negatively: the CAAR reached −3.75% over [0, +1] and −5.41% over [−5, +5], significant across all specifications. Sectoral heterogeneity was substantial. Consumer discretionary, consumer staples, and healthcare recorded the largest losses, consistent with weaker household purchasing power and demand. Energy firms earned positive abnormal returns, significant under parametric and marginally significant under non-parametric tests, consistent with wider refining margins and inventory revaluation gains. Cross-sectional regressions confirm that oil-sector firms outperformed, with the effect significant absent sector fixed effects and consistently positive throughout. The paper extends the geopolitical literature with a cross-sectional framework distinguishing firm-level oil-exposure effects from sector-level effects, showing how petroleum value-chain structure shapes responses to geopolitical shocks.

Cogent Economics & FinanceVol. 14(1)
Public Authority for Applied Education and Training (KW), American University of Ras Al Khaimah (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.