Facing the Risks: Complications, Prevention, and Management of Alloplastic Facial Implants in Aesthetic Surgery

Alloplastic facial implants provide durable, customizable skeletal augmentation without donor-site morbidity. However, infection, wound dehiscence, migration, extrusion, neurosensory injury, fluid collections, and pressure-related bony remodeling remain important concerns. This comprehensive review summarizes reported complications and practical strategies for prevention, recognition, and management in aesthetic facial implant surgery. PubMed was searched for studies published from February 23, 2016, through February 23, 2026, that evaluated alloplastic implants used for aesthetic facial skeletal augmentation and reported complication-related outcomes. Reference lists were screened manually. Twenty-two studies were included and synthesized narratively because of heterogeneity in implant location, material, surgical approach, and outcome reporting. Reported complication rates varied widely: infection, 2.6% to 23.8%; wound dehiscence, 1% to 23.8%; neurosensory disturbances, 0.28% to 19%; early fluid or vascular complications, 0.28% to 1.42%; and extrusion, 0.28%. Pressure-related bony remodeling was frequently observed radiographically but was generally asymptomatic. Intraoral approaches were associated with greater infection and dehiscence risk in the reviewed studies. Most transient sensory changes resolved with observation, whereas persistent infection, extrusion, and clinically significant migration often required revision or explantation. Careful patient selection, medical and dental optimization, meticulous sterile technique, precise pocket creation, secure fixation, dead-space control, and structured postoperative surveillance are central to reducing complications and improving outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000013384
Primary Topic
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facing the Risks: Complications, Prevention, and Management of Alloplastic Facial Implants in Aesthetic Surgery

Benjamin R. Slavin, Susan M. Taghioff, Stuti P. Garg, Albert Ting et al.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
article

Facing the Risks: Complications, Prevention, and Management of Alloplastic Facial Implants in Aesthetic Surgery

Benjamin R. Slavin, Susan M. Taghioff, Stuti P. Garg, Albert Ting, Jonathan P. Yasmeh, Shahin Javaheri, Shangtao Wu
article en

Abstract

Alloplastic facial implants provide durable, customizable skeletal augmentation without donor-site morbidity. However, infection, wound dehiscence, migration, extrusion, neurosensory injury, fluid collections, and pressure-related bony remodeling remain important concerns. This comprehensive review summarizes reported complications and practical strategies for prevention, recognition, and management in aesthetic facial implant surgery. PubMed was searched for studies published from February 23, 2016, through February 23, 2026, that evaluated alloplastic implants used for aesthetic facial skeletal augmentation and reported complication-related outcomes. Reference lists were screened manually. Twenty-two studies were included and synthesized narratively because of heterogeneity in implant location, material, surgical approach, and outcome reporting. Reported complication rates varied widely: infection, 2.6% to 23.8%; wound dehiscence, 1% to 23.8%; neurosensory disturbances, 0.28% to 19%; early fluid or vascular complications, 0.28% to 1.42%; and extrusion, 0.28%. Pressure-related bony remodeling was frequently observed radiographically but was generally asymptomatic. Intraoral approaches were associated with greater infection and dehiscence risk in the reviewed studies. Most transient sensory changes resolved with observation, whereas persistent infection, extrusion, and clinically significant migration often required revision or explantation. Careful patient selection, medical and dental optimization, meticulous sterile technique, precise pocket creation, secure fixation, dead-space control, and structured postoperative surveillance are central to reducing complications and improving outcomes.

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
University of Miami (US), Aesthetic Surgery Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.