Effect of erlotinib and celecoxib as short-course neoadjuvant therapy in operable oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized controlled window-of-opportunity trial

Background Delays in definitive surgery for operable oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) may allow tumor progression. This randomized phase II trial evaluated a short-course neoadjuvant combination of erlotinib and celecoxib during the preoperative waiting period. Methods Sixty-three patients with resectable OCSCC were randomized to celecoxib, erlotinib, combination therapy, or observation for 21 days before surgery. The primary endpoint was biomarker modulation; secondary endpoints were tumor response, safety, and feasibility. Biomarker modulation was analyzed using two-way ANCOVA of post-treatment levels adjusted for baseline expression. Clinical and radiological changes in the longest tumor dimension (LTD) were assessed. Results Erlotinib exposure was independently associated with significant reductions in CD31 (p < 0.001), CD34 (p = 0.006), and cytoplasmic AKT (p = 0.006). Celecoxib exposure was also associated with reduced CD31 expression (p = 0.003). No significant effects were observed on EGFR, COX-2, CD44, HIF1α, or PI3K. Erlotinib-containing regimens reduced or stabilized tumor size, whereas the observation arm showed tumor progression during the wait time for surgery. Partial clinical responses occurred in 43.7% with erlotinib and 60% with combination therapy. Toxicities were predominantly grade 1–2, mainly acneiform rash and transient hepatic dysfunction, and did not delay surgery. Combination therapy showed a trend toward reduced angiogenesis. Conclusions Short-course neoadjuvant erlotinib, particularly with celecoxib, is feasible, safe, and biologically active in operable OCSCC, supporting further evaluation to prevent progression during unavoidable surgical delays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oral Oncology
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2026.108156
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of erlotinib and celecoxib as short-course neoadjuvant therapy in operable oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized controlled window-of-opportunity trial

Prathamesh Pai, Swapnil Ulhas Rane, Tejpal Gupta, Manoj B. Mahimkar et al.
Oral Oncology
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Effect of erlotinib and celecoxib as short-course neoadjuvant therapy in operable oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized controlled window-of-opportunity trial

Prathamesh Pai, Swapnil Ulhas Rane, Tejpal Gupta, Manoj B. Mahimkar, Jai Prakash Agarwal, Vanita Noronha, Vijay Patil, Deepa Nair, Shwetabh Sinha, Kavita Sonawane, Amit Joshi, Sudhir Vasudevan Nair, Pankaj Kumar Chaturvedi, Asawari J. Patil, Mayuri Inchanalkar, Abhishek Mahajan, Kumar Prabhash, Nilesh Pandurang Sable, Amit Janu, Devendra A. Chaukar, Anil Keith Dcruz, Sarbani Laskar, V.V. Sameema, Rinal Chavdaa
article en

Abstract

Background Delays in definitive surgery for operable oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) may allow tumor progression. This randomized phase II trial evaluated a short-course neoadjuvant combination of erlotinib and celecoxib during the preoperative waiting period. Methods Sixty-three patients with resectable OCSCC were randomized to celecoxib, erlotinib, combination therapy, or observation for 21 days before surgery. The primary endpoint was biomarker modulation; secondary endpoints were tumor response, safety, and feasibility. Biomarker modulation was analyzed using two-way ANCOVA of post-treatment levels adjusted for baseline expression. Clinical and radiological changes in the longest tumor dimension (LTD) were assessed. Results Erlotinib exposure was independently associated with significant reductions in CD31 (p < 0.001), CD34 (p = 0.006), and cytoplasmic AKT (p = 0.006). Celecoxib exposure was also associated with reduced CD31 expression (p = 0.003). No significant effects were observed on EGFR, COX-2, CD44, HIF1α, or PI3K. Erlotinib-containing regimens reduced or stabilized tumor size, whereas the observation arm showed tumor progression during the wait time for surgery. Partial clinical responses occurred in 43.7% with erlotinib and 60% with combination therapy. Toxicities were predominantly grade 1–2, mainly acneiform rash and transient hepatic dysfunction, and did not delay surgery. Combination therapy showed a trend toward reduced angiogenesis. Conclusions Short-course neoadjuvant erlotinib, particularly with celecoxib, is feasible, safe, and biologically active in operable OCSCC, supporting further evaluation to prevent progression during unavoidable surgical delays.

Oral OncologyVol. 182
Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN), Tata Memorial Hospital (IN), Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.