Risk Factors Associated with Spinal Cord Stimulation Failure in Patients with Chronic Pain: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Background/Objectives: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can provide long-term relief for selected patients with refractory chronic pain, but treatment failure may occur without device explantation. This study examined patient-, clinical-, and device-related factors associated with SCS failure after permanent implantation. Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 108 adults who underwent permanent SCS implantation at the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal between 2007 and 2022. Failure was defined as completed or planned explantation, inadequate pain relief accompanied by a desire or plan for removal, or documented device non-use. Associations were evaluated using univariable categorical tests. Paired pain intensity and morphine milligram equivalent (MME) doses were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: At the most recent documented assessment, composite SCS failure occurred in 40/108 patients (37.0%), and completed explantation occurred in 25/108 (23.1%); these proportions were not adjusted for unequal follow-up duration. The leading reasons for explantation were loss of efficacy (36.0%), paresthesia or dysesthesia (28.0%), and patient request (24.0%). In exploratory univariable analysis, smoking was associated with documented failure (RR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.05–2.75; p = 0.032). Failure differed across comorbidity-count categories (Cramér’s V = 0.34, 95% CI 0.00–0.48; p = 0.019), although the pattern was nonmonotonic. Neither association remained statistically significant after Benjamini–Hochberg correction across 26 comparisons (both q = 0.416). Sex, psychiatric history, pain duration, implantation approach, generator type, and generator location were not significantly associated with failure. The median within-patient reduction in pain intensity was 2.50 points (IQR, 1.00–5.00; p < 0.001), whereas the median paired MME change was 0 MME/day (IQR, −60 to 40; p = 0.649). Conclusions: A composite outcome identified a higher prevalence of clinically unsuccessful SCS treatment than completed explantation alone. Smoking showed an unadjusted association with documented failure; however, this finding may reflect confounding or chance arising from multiple comparisons and should be considered hypothesis-generating. Pain intensity improved without a corresponding significant reduction in opioid exposure. These findings require confirmation through prospective, prespecified multivariable and time-to-event analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15197681
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Factors Associated with Spinal Cord Stimulation Failure in Patients with Chronic Pain: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

François Fugère, Marie‐Pierre Fournier‐Gosselin, Ahmed A. Najjar, Ahmed Osailan
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Pain Management and Treatment
article

Risk Factors Associated with Spinal Cord Stimulation Failure in Patients with Chronic Pain: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

François Fugère, Marie‐Pierre Fournier‐Gosselin, Ahmed A. Najjar, Ahmed Osailan
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can provide long-term relief for selected patients with refractory chronic pain, but treatment failure may occur without device explantation. This study examined patient-, clinical-, and device-related factors associated with SCS failure after permanent implantation. Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 108 adults who underwent permanent SCS implantation at the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal between 2007 and 2022. Failure was defined as completed or planned explantation, inadequate pain relief accompanied by a desire or plan for removal, or documented device non-use. Associations were evaluated using univariable categorical tests. Paired pain intensity and morphine milligram equivalent (MME) doses were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: At the most recent documented assessment, composite SCS failure occurred in 40/108 patients (37.0%), and completed explantation occurred in 25/108 (23.1%); these proportions were not adjusted for unequal follow-up duration. The leading reasons for explantation were loss of efficacy (36.0%), paresthesia or dysesthesia (28.0%), and patient request (24.0%). In exploratory univariable analysis, smoking was associated with documented failure (RR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.05–2.75; p = 0.032). Failure differed across comorbidity-count categories (Cramér’s V = 0.34, 95% CI 0.00–0.48; p = 0.019), although the pattern was nonmonotonic. Neither association remained statistically significant after Benjamini–Hochberg correction across 26 comparisons (both q = 0.416). Sex, psychiatric history, pain duration, implantation approach, generator type, and generator location were not significantly associated with failure. The median within-patient reduction in pain intensity was 2.50 points (IQR, 1.00–5.00; p < 0.001), whereas the median paired MME change was 0 MME/day (IQR, −60 to 40; p = 0.649). Conclusions: A composite outcome identified a higher prevalence of clinically unsuccessful SCS treatment than completed explantation alone. Smoking showed an unadjusted association with documented failure; however, this finding may reflect confounding or chance arising from multiple comparisons and should be considered hypothesis-generating. Pain intensity improved without a corresponding significant reduction in opioid exposure. These findings require confirmation through prospective, prespecified multivariable and time-to-event analyses.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(19)
Taibah University (SA), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA), Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pain Management and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.