MacIntyrean bioethics: reappraisal and outline of a research programme

Alasdair MacIntyre’s (1929–2025) work in moral philosophy was wide-ranging, erudite and controversial. Following his death in 2025, it is appropriate to reappraise the relevance of his work to bioethics. MacIntyre’s analysis may helpfully be divided into his ‘critical project’, which criticises modern moral philosophy and reveals and explains its shortcomings, several of which arguably affect bioethics; and his ‘constructive project’, which sets out MacIntyre’s version of neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics. We summarise these ‘projects’ and how they have been used within bioethics. Our claim is that there is still significant untapped potential for work in medical ethics/bioethics inspired by MacIntyre. We propose further uses of MacIntyre under the five headings critical, diagnostic, revisionist, normative and hermeneutic. The article ends with a brief reflection on the merits and limits of a MacIntyrean bioethics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Ethics
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2026-112142
Primary Topic
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MacIntyrean bioethics: reappraisal and outline of a research programme

Eilev Hegstad, Morten Magelssen, Søren Holm, Skylar Christoffersen
Journal of Medical Ethics
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
article

MacIntyrean bioethics: reappraisal and outline of a research programme

Eilev Hegstad, Morten Magelssen, Søren Holm, Skylar Christoffersen
article en

Abstract

Alasdair MacIntyre’s (1929–2025) work in moral philosophy was wide-ranging, erudite and controversial. Following his death in 2025, it is appropriate to reappraise the relevance of his work to bioethics. MacIntyre’s analysis may helpfully be divided into his ‘critical project’, which criticises modern moral philosophy and reveals and explains its shortcomings, several of which arguably affect bioethics; and his ‘constructive project’, which sets out MacIntyre’s version of neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics. We summarise these ‘projects’ and how they have been used within bioethics. Our claim is that there is still significant untapped potential for work in medical ethics/bioethics inspired by MacIntyre. We propose further uses of MacIntyre under the five headings critical, diagnostic, revisionist, normative and hermeneutic. The article ends with a brief reflection on the merits and limits of a MacIntyrean bioethics.

Journal of Medical Ethics
Harvard University (US), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of Oslo (NO), University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

MacIntyrean bioethics: reappraisal and outline of a research programme — Eilev Hegstad, Morten Magelssen, et al. · Journal of Medical Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS