Supporting Reliable Assessment of Clinical Judgment Skills in Simulation Environments

Background: Clinical judgment skills, a key component of nursing competency, are difficult to accurately and consistently assess. To support evaluation of these skills using Lasater's ( 2007 ) clinical judgment rubric (LCJR), rater training resources were developed and evaluated. Method: A one-group pretest-posttest design evaluated the effect of developed resources on agreement between two novice raters (NRs) and resource developers. NR-CE had content expertise; NR-NNE had no nursing experience. Results: Pre-training, total scores showed poor agreement between novice and trained raters (ICC absolute (2,1) LCJR total for NR-CE = −.59; LCJR total for NR-N NE = .24). Posttraining, agreement was higher (ICC absolute (2,1) LCJR total NR- CE = .70; LCJR total NR-N NE = .76). Dimension-level scoring showed more variability in reliability estimates. Conclusion: Training supported raters with and without content expertise in developing a shared mental model of CJS. Future work should replicate these findings with larger samples for more confidence in results and examine convergent validity by comparing ratings to external benchmarks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nursing Education
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20260820-01
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting Reliable Assessment of Clinical Judgment Skills in Simulation Environments

Megan W. Stuhlman, Crystal Bencken, P. Buck, Darla S. Morton et al.
Journal of Nursing Education
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Supporting Reliable Assessment of Clinical Judgment Skills in Simulation Environments

Megan W. Stuhlman, Crystal Bencken, P. Buck, Darla S. Morton, Cherice Avila, Jennifer Noble, Catherine B. Trent, Kendra Mickens, Stacy S. Capel, Amy Smith
article en

Abstract

Background: Clinical judgment skills, a key component of nursing competency, are difficult to accurately and consistently assess. To support evaluation of these skills using Lasater's ( 2007 ) clinical judgment rubric (LCJR), rater training resources were developed and evaluated. Method: A one-group pretest-posttest design evaluated the effect of developed resources on agreement between two novice raters (NRs) and resource developers. NR-CE had content expertise; NR-NNE had no nursing experience. Results: Pre-training, total scores showed poor agreement between novice and trained raters (ICC absolute (2,1) LCJR total for NR-CE = −.59; LCJR total for NR-N NE = .24). Posttraining, agreement was higher (ICC absolute (2,1) LCJR total NR- CE = .70; LCJR total NR-N NE = .76). Dimension-level scoring showed more variability in reliability estimates. Conclusion: Training supported raters with and without content expertise in developing a shared mental model of CJS. Future work should replicate these findings with larger samples for more confidence in results and examine convergent validity by comparing ratings to external benchmarks.

Journal of Nursing Education
Carolinas Healthcare System (US), Carolinas Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.