Managed Aquifer Recharge Operations and Design under Hydrologic Uncertainty

As climate change intensifies, managed aquifer recharge (MAR) can enhance water security and strengthen drought resilience by capturing surface water, such as drain flows. Assessments of MAR impact and risks to groundwater-dependent receptors require numerical modeling. Yet many studies do not account for contrasting climatic conditions, surface-water and groundwater integration, and dual ensembles of MAR operations and of hydrologic/landscape parameters when quantifying uncertainty using the iterative ensemble smoother (IES) as done here for a proposed MAR in the Myalup region of Western Australia. For each MAR scenario, decision metrics-groundwater mounding, inundation and waterlogging, travel times to environmental receptors-were evaluated across the parameter ensemble. Spatial analysis from a likely IES realization showed drain discharge constraining mound expansion, recovery mitigating small increases in drain flow, localized inundation risk, and MAR plumes reaching downgradient wetlands within two decades. Predictive uncertainty of MAR scenarios varied substantially, with climate conditions as dominant control. Wettest and driest cases bracket divertible flow conditions. Inundation risk was greater for wet than dry scenarios, suggesting drier climates may reduce MAR impacts, although wet extremes must be accommodated. Recovery reduced mounding but barely altered transport pathways. Relocating MAR away from a drain lowered uncertainty and environmental impacts. MAR designs can be selected by minimizing probabilities of exceeding stakeholder-defined thresholds or balancing trade-offs between impact metrics. This dual-ensemble methodology of MAR scenarios and IES parameters provides robust and transferable uncertainty quantification for evidence-based MAR planning under hydrologic uncertainty and climatic extremes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ground Water
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.70105
Primary Topic
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managed Aquifer Recharge Operations and Design under Hydrologic Uncertainty

Michael J. Donn, Adam J. Siade, Wolfgang Schmid, Olga V. Barron et al.
Ground Water
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
article

Managed Aquifer Recharge Operations and Design under Hydrologic Uncertainty

Michael J. Donn, Adam J. Siade, Wolfgang Schmid, Olga V. Barron, Adrian Dela Cruz
article en

Abstract

As climate change intensifies, managed aquifer recharge (MAR) can enhance water security and strengthen drought resilience by capturing surface water, such as drain flows. Assessments of MAR impact and risks to groundwater-dependent receptors require numerical modeling. Yet many studies do not account for contrasting climatic conditions, surface-water and groundwater integration, and dual ensembles of MAR operations and of hydrologic/landscape parameters when quantifying uncertainty using the iterative ensemble smoother (IES) as done here for a proposed MAR in the Myalup region of Western Australia. For each MAR scenario, decision metrics-groundwater mounding, inundation and waterlogging, travel times to environmental receptors-were evaluated across the parameter ensemble. Spatial analysis from a likely IES realization showed drain discharge constraining mound expansion, recovery mitigating small increases in drain flow, localized inundation risk, and MAR plumes reaching downgradient wetlands within two decades. Predictive uncertainty of MAR scenarios varied substantially, with climate conditions as dominant control. Wettest and driest cases bracket divertible flow conditions. Inundation risk was greater for wet than dry scenarios, suggesting drier climates may reduce MAR impacts, although wet extremes must be accommodated. Recovery reduced mounding but barely altered transport pathways. Relocating MAR away from a drain lowered uncertainty and environmental impacts. MAR designs can be selected by minimizing probabilities of exceeding stakeholder-defined thresholds or balancing trade-offs between impact metrics. This dual-ensemble methodology of MAR scenarios and IES parameters provides robust and transferable uncertainty quantification for evidence-based MAR planning under hydrologic uncertainty and climatic extremes.

Ground Water
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), CSIRO Land and Water (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.