De facto authority and contested legitimacy: the CUP Erzurum branch in provincial politics, 1908–1913

This article examines the Erzurum branch of the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) between 1908 and 1913, analysing how a clandestine organisation was transformed into a de facto administrative authority in the aftermath of the Young Turk Revolution. Drawing on Ottoman archival documents and British consular reports, the study argues that the Erzurum CUP branch systematically circumvented formal institutional channels by controlling administrative appointments, imposing compulsory financial levies on state officials, and mobilising local society during national crises. The article further argues that the branch’s authority rested largely on coercive mechanisms rather than genuine social consent, and that the multicultural promise expressed as ittihad-ı anasır (Unity of the Ottoman elements) was gradually eroded in the face of mounting tensions between Muslim and Armenian communities. The Erzurum case presents the constitutional period not merely as a moment of liberal transformation, but as an unstable process of power redistribution at the provincial level, one that ultimately deepened the empire’s governance crisis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Middle Eastern Studies
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2026.2739426
Primary Topic
Historical Turkish Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De facto authority and contested legitimacy: the CUP Erzurum branch in provincial politics, 1908–1913

Ahmet Deniz
Middle Eastern Studies
Historical Turkish Studies
article

De facto authority and contested legitimacy: the CUP Erzurum branch in provincial politics, 1908–1913

Ahmet Deniz
article en

Abstract

This article examines the Erzurum branch of the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) between 1908 and 1913, analysing how a clandestine organisation was transformed into a de facto administrative authority in the aftermath of the Young Turk Revolution. Drawing on Ottoman archival documents and British consular reports, the study argues that the Erzurum CUP branch systematically circumvented formal institutional channels by controlling administrative appointments, imposing compulsory financial levies on state officials, and mobilising local society during national crises. The article further argues that the branch’s authority rested largely on coercive mechanisms rather than genuine social consent, and that the multicultural promise expressed as ittihad-ı anasır (Unity of the Ottoman elements) was gradually eroded in the face of mounting tensions between Muslim and Armenian communities. The Erzurum case presents the constitutional period not merely as a moment of liberal transformation, but as an unstable process of power redistribution at the provincial level, one that ultimately deepened the empire’s governance crisis.

Middle Eastern Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Historical Turkish Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

De facto authority and contested legitimacy: the CUP Erzurum branch in provincial politics, 1908–1913 — Ahmet Deniz · Middle Eastern Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS