Two Algebraic Thresholds for Relaxations of Stable Metric TSP

Bilu–Linial stability asks whether an optimal solution remains uniquely optimal after every independent multiplicative increase of the input costs by a prescribed factor. For symmetric metric TSP, every 1.8-stable instance is solvable in polynomial time, and both the subtour relaxation and the weaker degree-only cycle-cover relaxation are exact at that threshold. We give explicit algebraic lower bounds showing that exactness can fail substantially below 1.8. First, for every gamma < (8 - sqrt(13))/3 = 1.464816..., we construct a gamma-stable metric instance whose subtour relaxation is strictly cheaper than the optimal tour; this constant is the exact threshold of a natural uniform three-path family. Second, let beta = 1.696023173588... be the unique root in (3/2, 17/10) of q^6 - 28q^4 + 72q^3 - 35q^2 - 24q - 2. For every gamma < beta, an explicit ten-city parametric metric has a strictly cheaper integral cycle cover than its unique optimal tour, and beta is the exact degree-relaxation threshold of that family. What is separated here are the two lower bounds, not the two thresholds themselves: both are still known only to be at most 1.8. The proofs combine analytic exchange bounds with exact computer-assisted certificates over algebraic number fields. All metric, tour, and cycle-cover comparisons use integer or symbolic arithmetic; no floating-point comparison decides any claim. This record contains the manuscript and the complete, reproducible proof artifacts. Version 1.1.0 adds a declaration of generative AI use before the references and cites the concept DOI, which always resolves to the latest version. The mathematical content is unchanged.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23156427
Primary Topic
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Two Algebraic Thresholds for Relaxations of Stable Metric TSP

Sungsoo Na
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
preprint

Two Algebraic Thresholds for Relaxations of Stable Metric TSP

Sungsoo Na
preprint en

Abstract

Bilu–Linial stability asks whether an optimal solution remains uniquely optimal after every independent multiplicative increase of the input costs by a prescribed factor. For symmetric metric TSP, every 1.8-stable instance is solvable in polynomial time, and both the subtour relaxation and the weaker degree-only cycle-cover relaxation are exact at that threshold. We give explicit algebraic lower bounds showing that exactness can fail substantially below 1.8. First, for every gamma < (8 - sqrt(13))/3 = 1.464816..., we construct a gamma-stable metric instance whose subtour relaxation is strictly cheaper than the optimal tour; this constant is the exact threshold of a natural uniform three-path family. Second, let beta = 1.696023173588... be the unique root in (3/2, 17/10) of q^6 - 28q^4 + 72q^3 - 35q^2 - 24q - 2. For every gamma < beta, an explicit ten-city parametric metric has a strictly cheaper integral cycle cover than its unique optimal tour, and beta is the exact degree-relaxation threshold of that family. What is separated here are the two lower bounds, not the two thresholds themselves: both are still known only to be at most 1.8. The proofs combine analytic exchange bounds with exact computer-assisted certificates over algebraic number fields. All metric, tour, and cycle-cover comparisons use integer or symbolic arithmetic; no floating-point comparison decides any claim. This record contains the manuscript and the complete, reproducible proof artifacts. Version 1.1.0 adds a declaration of generative AI use before the references and cites the concept DOI, which always resolves to the latest version. The mathematical content is unchanged.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.