Multi-Stage Fatigue Characterization of Asphalt Mixtures Under Stress- and Displacement-Controlled Loading

Conventional laboratory fatigue tests are often limited to single-stage loading. As a result, they do not fully capture the progressive damage caused by repeated traffic loading. To address this limitation, this study proposes an integrated multi-stage fatigue testing (MSFT) framework. The framework combines Multi-Stage Stress-Controlled Dynamic (MSSD) testing and Multi-Stage Displacement-Controlled Dynamic (MSDD) testing. These two modes are used to characterize asphalt mixture fatigue behavior under complementary loading conditions. The proposed framework interprets stress-controlled and displacement-controlled responses together. This allows the two responses to be evaluated as part of one integrated system, rather than as separate tests. The experimental program included asphalt mixtures with different air-void contents, binder contents, and binder grades. Fatigue performance under MSDD loading was evaluated using dissipated-energy-based and force-response parameters. In contrast, MSSD response was characterized using fracture-mechanics-based Paris law fatigue indicators. The results showed that air-void content, binder content, and binder grade produced different fatigue responses under the two loading modes. Lower air-void content improved fatigue life and energy tolerance. High-air-void mixtures showed faster damage accumulation. Binder-rich mixtures performed better under displacement-controlled loading because they better accommodated the imposed displacement. However, they showed higher crack-growth sensitivity under stress-controlled loading. This confirms that asphalt mixtures can behave differently depending on the loading mode. The results show clear and systematic differences between the two loading modes. These differences reveal mode sensitivity that cannot be identified using a single fatigue test. Some mixtures performed well under one loading condition but showed lower resistance under the other. This presents the need for integrated interpretation when ranking mixtures. The proposed dual-mode framework can support tiered Balanced Mix Design decisions within performance-based specification systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16193941
Primary Topic
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Stage Fatigue Characterization of Asphalt Mixtures Under Stress- and Displacement-Controlled Loading

Emad Kassem, Ahmed W. Oda, Hussain Al Hatailah
Buildings
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
article

Multi-Stage Fatigue Characterization of Asphalt Mixtures Under Stress- and Displacement-Controlled Loading

Emad Kassem, Ahmed W. Oda, Hussain Al Hatailah
article en

Abstract

Conventional laboratory fatigue tests are often limited to single-stage loading. As a result, they do not fully capture the progressive damage caused by repeated traffic loading. To address this limitation, this study proposes an integrated multi-stage fatigue testing (MSFT) framework. The framework combines Multi-Stage Stress-Controlled Dynamic (MSSD) testing and Multi-Stage Displacement-Controlled Dynamic (MSDD) testing. These two modes are used to characterize asphalt mixture fatigue behavior under complementary loading conditions. The proposed framework interprets stress-controlled and displacement-controlled responses together. This allows the two responses to be evaluated as part of one integrated system, rather than as separate tests. The experimental program included asphalt mixtures with different air-void contents, binder contents, and binder grades. Fatigue performance under MSDD loading was evaluated using dissipated-energy-based and force-response parameters. In contrast, MSSD response was characterized using fracture-mechanics-based Paris law fatigue indicators. The results showed that air-void content, binder content, and binder grade produced different fatigue responses under the two loading modes. Lower air-void content improved fatigue life and energy tolerance. High-air-void mixtures showed faster damage accumulation. Binder-rich mixtures performed better under displacement-controlled loading because they better accommodated the imposed displacement. However, they showed higher crack-growth sensitivity under stress-controlled loading. This confirms that asphalt mixtures can behave differently depending on the loading mode. The results show clear and systematic differences between the two loading modes. These differences reveal mode sensitivity that cannot be identified using a single fatigue test. Some mixtures performed well under one loading condition but showed lower resistance under the other. This presents the need for integrated interpretation when ranking mixtures. The proposed dual-mode framework can support tiered Balanced Mix Design decisions within performance-based specification systems.

BuildingsVol. 16(19)
University of Idaho (US), Najran University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.