Knowledge of pressure injury prevention and perceived barriers to applying it among nursing students at a tertiary institution in the United Arab Emirates: a mixed-methods study

Pressure injuries are largely preventable, yet their burden across acute care in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the Gulf region is substantial. It is unknown if pre-registration education in the UAE equips nursing students with the requisite knowledge. This study assessed nursing students’ knowledge of pressure injury prevention and the barriers they perceived to applying it in clinical practice. A concurrent, equal-status mixed-methods study was conducted among 133 nursing students in academic years 2–4 at a UAE health sciences college, using an adapted 31-item Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge (PIPK) questionnaire and two open-ended questions on perceived barriers and suggested improvements. Descriptive statistics, Welch’s t-test, one-way and Welch ANOVA, chi-square/Fisher-Freeman-Halton tests, Pearson and Spearman correlations, and a multivariable linear regression were computed for the quantitative arm of the study. Barriers and strategies were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Participants (mean age 21.9 ± 1.9 years; 99.2% Emirati) scored 19.9 ± 5.2 of 31 (64.1% ± 16.6%); 20.3% met the pre-specified good-knowledge threshold (≥ 80%), 42.1% moderate (60–79%), and 37.6% poor (< 60%). Performance was markedly and significantly better on true-keyed than on false-keyed items (mean 79.7% vs. 40.5% correct; paired t = 18.96, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.65). Knowledge was weakly associated with year of study (Spearman ρ = 0.23–0.25, p < 0.01) and clinical placements completed (ρ = 0.22, p = 0.01), but in an adjusted multivariable model no individual predictor remained statistically significant (R² = 0.07, p = 0.09). There were six categories of barriers; poor training-practice linkage (54%), lack of time (51%), workforce-capacity constraints (43%), lack of equipment (26%), communication or documentation breakdown (13%) and patient-related complexity (12%). Suggested improvements included regular training (58.9%), simulation (35.7%) and updated guidelines (22.3%). Nursing students showed moderate knowledge of pressure injury prevention overall. Knowledge was associated with academic seniority. Barriers to applying the prevention knowledge included insufficient training/practice opportunities, time and workforce constraints. More training, simulation, and accessible guidelines that address these barriers are needed to improve knowledge of pressure injury prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10537-8
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge of pressure injury prevention and perceived barriers to applying it among nursing students at a tertiary institution in the United Arab Emirates: a mixed-methods study

Doreen Macherera Mukona, Augustine Ndaimani, Mathilda Zvinavashe, Rutendo Mukona
BMC Medical Education
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
article

Knowledge of pressure injury prevention and perceived barriers to applying it among nursing students at a tertiary institution in the United Arab Emirates: a mixed-methods study

Doreen Macherera Mukona, Augustine Ndaimani, Mathilda Zvinavashe, Rutendo Mukona
article en

Abstract

Pressure injuries are largely preventable, yet their burden across acute care in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the Gulf region is substantial. It is unknown if pre-registration education in the UAE equips nursing students with the requisite knowledge. This study assessed nursing students’ knowledge of pressure injury prevention and the barriers they perceived to applying it in clinical practice. A concurrent, equal-status mixed-methods study was conducted among 133 nursing students in academic years 2–4 at a UAE health sciences college, using an adapted 31-item Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge (PIPK) questionnaire and two open-ended questions on perceived barriers and suggested improvements. Descriptive statistics, Welch’s t-test, one-way and Welch ANOVA, chi-square/Fisher-Freeman-Halton tests, Pearson and Spearman correlations, and a multivariable linear regression were computed for the quantitative arm of the study. Barriers and strategies were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Participants (mean age 21.9 ± 1.9 years; 99.2% Emirati) scored 19.9 ± 5.2 of 31 (64.1% ± 16.6%); 20.3% met the pre-specified good-knowledge threshold (≥ 80%), 42.1% moderate (60–79%), and 37.6% poor (< 60%). Performance was markedly and significantly better on true-keyed than on false-keyed items (mean 79.7% vs. 40.5% correct; paired t = 18.96, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.65). Knowledge was weakly associated with year of study (Spearman ρ = 0.23–0.25, p < 0.01) and clinical placements completed (ρ = 0.22, p = 0.01), but in an adjusted multivariable model no individual predictor remained statistically significant (R² = 0.07, p = 0.09). There were six categories of barriers; poor training-practice linkage (54%), lack of time (51%), workforce-capacity constraints (43%), lack of equipment (26%), communication or documentation breakdown (13%) and patient-related complexity (12%). Suggested improvements included regular training (58.9%), simulation (35.7%) and updated guidelines (22.3%). Nursing students showed moderate knowledge of pressure injury prevention overall. Knowledge was associated with academic seniority. Barriers to applying the prevention knowledge included insufficient training/practice opportunities, time and workforce constraints. More training, simulation, and accessible guidelines that address these barriers are needed to improve knowledge of pressure injury prevention.

BMC Medical Education
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US), University of Zimbabwe (ZW), Ajman University (AE), University of Global Health Equity (RW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.