Child Protection and Welfare Services for Disabled Children: Insights Through an Ecological Systems Frame

Social injustices around maltreatment risk and professional safeguarding responses for children with disabilities feature in international research. In general, children with disabilities are substantially more likely to experience violence and maltreatment above their majority population peers. Adding to this disadvantage are service discrepancies, shortcomings, under-resourcing, and bureaucratic stalemates in safeguarding of children with disabilities. In safeguarding casework, the individual lived experience of the child with disability and structural societal context are often separated. Pressurised practice realities of child protection work compel this, because attention to immediate risk at an individual level often prevails over making societal change. Yet, the complexity of intersecting inequalities around disability and child protection includes the individual lived reality and the power-saturated social organisation of societies at large. As such, the focus in this article is on critical application of an ecological systems frame. This is used to conceptually map key factors spanning all levels at the intersection of disability and child protection. Discussion is then presented to consider the significance of findings. In concluding, implications for future policy and practice are considered.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Practice
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2026.2741821
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Child Protection and Welfare Services for Disabled Children: Insights Through an Ecological Systems Frame

Susan Flynn
Practice
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

Child Protection and Welfare Services for Disabled Children: Insights Through an Ecological Systems Frame

Susan Flynn
article en

Abstract

Social injustices around maltreatment risk and professional safeguarding responses for children with disabilities feature in international research. In general, children with disabilities are substantially more likely to experience violence and maltreatment above their majority population peers. Adding to this disadvantage are service discrepancies, shortcomings, under-resourcing, and bureaucratic stalemates in safeguarding of children with disabilities. In safeguarding casework, the individual lived experience of the child with disability and structural societal context are often separated. Pressurised practice realities of child protection work compel this, because attention to immediate risk at an individual level often prevails over making societal change. Yet, the complexity of intersecting inequalities around disability and child protection includes the individual lived reality and the power-saturated social organisation of societies at large. As such, the focus in this article is on critical application of an ecological systems frame. This is used to conceptually map key factors spanning all levels at the intersection of disability and child protection. Discussion is then presented to consider the significance of findings. In concluding, implications for future policy and practice are considered.

Practice
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Child Protection and Welfare Services for Disabled Children: Insights Through an Ecological Systems Frame — Susan Flynn · Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS