Beyond Grades: Temporal Validation of a Multi-Output Model for Formative Academic Indicators in a Latin American Public University
Learning-platform records are often assembled after a course ends, obscuring whether predictors were available at an earlier decision point. We reconstructed student-course-period observations from pseudonymized assignment, assessment, learning-management-system, and forum events across nine official undergraduate periods (2020-1 to 2024-1) at a Mexican public university. For 7963 candidate observations, 16 predictors used events at or before 25%, 50%, or 75% of each period; five formative outcomes were defined on assignments due and examinations started after the cutoff. A shared-trunk multi-output neural network was evaluated with grouped cross-validation, course-held-out validation, and a retrospective 2024-1 holdout. Only future assignment non-submission showed a consistent aggregate signal (grouped cross-validation R2 = 0.217, 0.253, and 0.147). At 50%, leave-one-course-out R2 was 0.211, but median course-level R2 was −0.146. On the 2024-1 holdout, R2 was 0.144 (95% confidence interval [−0.328, 0.335]; n = 471), below a prior-submission persistence rule (R2 = 0.324). Other outcomes lacked stable performance, and prior examination accuracy approximated future accuracy better than the model. The findings support a limited retrospective association, not reliable course-level prediction, early-warning deployment, or intervention effectiveness. The contribution is a temporally explicit reconstruction and validation workflow for an underrepresented Latin American context.
Authors
- Pedro Cesar Santana-Mancilla (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4184-0116)
- Luis Anido (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2780-2727)
- Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Ortiz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7545-2533)
Institutions
- Universidade de Vigo (ES)
- Universidad de Colima (MX)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Applied Sciences
- Published
- 2026-10-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/app16199865
- Primary Topic
- Online Learning and Analytics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00