How Aesthetic and Economic Factors Affect Consumers’ Purchasing Decisions: Evidence from EEG

Consumer theory identifies cultural and economic factors as key influences on purchasing decisions. Artworks, as material carriers of culture, are shaped by these factors in a particularly pronounced way. This study proposes that consumers’ artwork purchasing decisions are jointly determined by aesthetic and economic considerations. Using event-related potential (ERP) technology, artworks were classified into a 2 by 2 matrix of aesthetic valence and price. Seventy students from a university in western China made purchase or rejection decisions while their electroencephalogram was recorded. Results showed that both aesthetic and price factors jointly influenced artwork purchasing decisions. Aesthetic valence had a larger effect (F(1, 69) = 134.98, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.662) than price (F(1, 69) = 22.47, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.246), and participants were most willing to buy positively rated, low-priced artworks (M = 42.2%, SD = 24.2). The medial frontal negativity (MFN) amplitude and theta-band power were larger during purchase than rejection decisions, and this difference was most pronounced when participants chose to buy negatively rated artworks (t(48) = 4.31, p < 0.001, d = 0.61). Because the sample was drawn from a single university in western China and consisted of young students, the conclusions carry generalisability limitations. This study maps aesthetic and economic considerations during consumer purchasing onto separable neural processes, contributing to the intersection of cultural neuroscience and neuroeconomics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16101819
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Aesthetic and Economic Factors Affect Consumers’ Purchasing Decisions: Evidence from EEG

Shaohua Kong, Hanzun Li, Hongyu Fang
Behavioral Sciences
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

How Aesthetic and Economic Factors Affect Consumers’ Purchasing Decisions: Evidence from EEG

Shaohua Kong, Hanzun Li, Hongyu Fang
article en

Abstract

Consumer theory identifies cultural and economic factors as key influences on purchasing decisions. Artworks, as material carriers of culture, are shaped by these factors in a particularly pronounced way. This study proposes that consumers’ artwork purchasing decisions are jointly determined by aesthetic and economic considerations. Using event-related potential (ERP) technology, artworks were classified into a 2 by 2 matrix of aesthetic valence and price. Seventy students from a university in western China made purchase or rejection decisions while their electroencephalogram was recorded. Results showed that both aesthetic and price factors jointly influenced artwork purchasing decisions. Aesthetic valence had a larger effect (F(1, 69) = 134.98, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.662) than price (F(1, 69) = 22.47, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.246), and participants were most willing to buy positively rated, low-priced artworks (M = 42.2%, SD = 24.2). The medial frontal negativity (MFN) amplitude and theta-band power were larger during purchase than rejection decisions, and this difference was most pronounced when participants chose to buy negatively rated artworks (t(48) = 4.31, p < 0.001, d = 0.61). Because the sample was drawn from a single university in western China and consisted of young students, the conclusions carry generalisability limitations. This study maps aesthetic and economic considerations during consumer purchasing onto separable neural processes, contributing to the intersection of cultural neuroscience and neuroeconomics.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(10)
Central University of Finance and Economics (CN), China University of Political Science and Law (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.