Resource-Limited Microbial Water Quality Monitoring: A Study on “Field Hacks”

Abstract Microbial water quality monitoring (MWQM) methods often need to be adapted to overcome resource-related limitations. This study aims to synthesize these adaptations, informally termed “field hacks”, and identify common motivations behind them. Professionals in the MWQM sector were initially identified by a literature/web search and professional networks, followed by further enrollment by snowball sampling (N = 17). Semi-structured interviews were conducted via online video calls to probe these individuals on how they carry out standardized MWQM procedures in resource-limited environments. In total, 58 different adaptations were catalogued, with all but one participant reporting at least one adaptation. Thematic analysis was used to develop nine categories that describe the motivations behind adapting standard methods, revealing the barriers that persist despite significant technological advancement. The categories are reducing plastic waste, insufficient laboratory capacity, insufficient electricity, workflow logistics, user-friendliness, knowledge barrier, budgetary considerations, lack of equipment, and supply procurement. These findings reveal a gap between standard testing protocols and the realities of MWQM in practice, and this catalogue of adaptations can serve as a reference for those working in this area. There is also a need for methodological innovation and verification to overcome the barriers identified in this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Water
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.5c01453
Primary Topic
Fecal contamination and water quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resource-Limited Microbial Water Quality Monitoring: A Study on “Field Hacks”

Rachel Boyer, Caetano C. Dorea, Sara J. Marks
ACS ES&T Water
Fecal contamination and water quality
article

Resource-Limited Microbial Water Quality Monitoring: A Study on “Field Hacks”

Rachel Boyer, Caetano C. Dorea, Sara J. Marks
article en

Abstract

Abstract Microbial water quality monitoring (MWQM) methods often need to be adapted to overcome resource-related limitations. This study aims to synthesize these adaptations, informally termed “field hacks”, and identify common motivations behind them. Professionals in the MWQM sector were initially identified by a literature/web search and professional networks, followed by further enrollment by snowball sampling (N = 17). Semi-structured interviews were conducted via online video calls to probe these individuals on how they carry out standardized MWQM procedures in resource-limited environments. In total, 58 different adaptations were catalogued, with all but one participant reporting at least one adaptation. Thematic analysis was used to develop nine categories that describe the motivations behind adapting standard methods, revealing the barriers that persist despite significant technological advancement. The categories are reducing plastic waste, insufficient laboratory capacity, insufficient electricity, workflow logistics, user-friendliness, knowledge barrier, budgetary considerations, lack of equipment, and supply procurement. These findings reveal a gap between standard testing protocols and the realities of MWQM in practice, and this catalogue of adaptations can serve as a reference for those working in this area. There is also a need for methodological innovation and verification to overcome the barriers identified in this study.

ACS ES&T Water
University of Victoria (CA), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Fecal contamination and water quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.