Failure Pressure of Corroded-Pipeline Prediction—Artificial-Intelligence Model with FEM and Experimental Data

This research work aims to implement empirical models for predicting the failure pressure of a pipeline corroded with a single defect and internal pressure applications. For this purpose, five approaches were used: two artificial intelligence (AI) models with experimental data, a finite-element model (FEM), and two analytical models (ASME B31G modified and DNV-RP-F101). The two proposed artificial models were implemented and optimized in order to find their best performance. The first AI method is an artificial neural network with multilayer perceptron (ANN-MLP), and the second is a support vector machine radial basis function (SVM-RBF). The comparison of the results of these two models proves the good precision of the ANN-MLP, with the correlation coefficient R = 0.9906 and R = 0.9888, ahead of the SVM-RBF with R = 0.9290 and R = 0.9260, respectively, for the two phases of training and testing. In addition, the output results of ANN-MLP are analyzed by William’s diagram; it was noted that 97.82% (180/184) of points belong to the field of validity and applicability of the artificial optimal model. In addition, the sensitivity analysis demonstrates a linear correlation between depth defect and the failure pressure with 32.77%, followed by the length of defect and the inner diameter with 20.04% and 19.81%, respectively. According to the present regression analysis, the results obtained from the ANN-MLP and finite-element method (FEM) are more accurate compared with SVM-RBF and other analytical models. However, the predicted failure pressure values demonstrated strong agreement across all the five approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7100521
Primary Topic
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure Pressure of Corroded-Pipeline Prediction—Artificial-Intelligence Model with FEM and Experimental Data

Abderrezak Bezazi, Ghania Habbar, Abdel‐Nasser Sharkawy, Abdennasser Dahmani et al.
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
article

Failure Pressure of Corroded-Pipeline Prediction—Artificial-Intelligence Model with FEM and Experimental Data

Abderrezak Bezazi, Ghania Habbar, Abdel‐Nasser Sharkawy, Abdennasser Dahmani, Rami K. Suleiman, Mohammed Hadj Meliani, Abdelhakim Maizia, Abdelkader Hocine, Ikram Kouidri
article en

Abstract

This research work aims to implement empirical models for predicting the failure pressure of a pipeline corroded with a single defect and internal pressure applications. For this purpose, five approaches were used: two artificial intelligence (AI) models with experimental data, a finite-element model (FEM), and two analytical models (ASME B31G modified and DNV-RP-F101). The two proposed artificial models were implemented and optimized in order to find their best performance. The first AI method is an artificial neural network with multilayer perceptron (ANN-MLP), and the second is a support vector machine radial basis function (SVM-RBF). The comparison of the results of these two models proves the good precision of the ANN-MLP, with the correlation coefficient R = 0.9906 and R = 0.9888, ahead of the SVM-RBF with R = 0.9290 and R = 0.9260, respectively, for the two phases of training and testing. In addition, the output results of ANN-MLP are analyzed by William’s diagram; it was noted that 97.82% (180/184) of points belong to the field of validity and applicability of the artificial optimal model. In addition, the sensitivity analysis demonstrates a linear correlation between depth defect and the failure pressure with 32.77%, followed by the length of defect and the inner diameter with 20.04% and 19.81%, respectively. According to the present regression analysis, the results obtained from the ANN-MLP and finite-element method (FEM) are more accurate compared with SVM-RBF and other analytical models. However, the predicted failure pressure values demonstrated strong agreement across all the five approaches.

Eng—Advances in EngineeringVol. 7(10)
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), Polytechnic School of Algiers (DZ), Higher National Veterinary School (DZ), Fahd bin Sultan University (SA), University of Guelma (DZ), Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef (DZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.