Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Prestressed Concrete Railway Sleepers: A 100-Year Perspective

Railway infrastructure components have long service lives and require periodic maintenance and replacement, making their environmental and economic performance relevant from a life-cycle perspective. This study investigates Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost Assessment (LCCA) to evaluate 1 km of RFI 260-VN prestressed concrete railway sleepers over a 100-year period. The LCA follows ISO 14044 and EN 15804, while the LCCA follows ISO 15686-5 and considers discount rates of 1%, 3%, and 6%, together with a Project Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)-based reference value. In the baseline scenario, the total climate change impact (GWP-t) is 588,835 kg CO2 eq./km, with the production stage accounting for 85.1% of the total. Non-renewable primary energy use (PENRE) is 5,830,475 MJ/km, compared with 229,859 MJ/km of renewable primary energy (PERE). The total life-cycle cost ranges from 2.35 million €/km ranges from €2.35 million/km at a 1% discount rate to 0.92 million €/km at 6%, with a PERT-based value of 1.40 million €/km. A sensitivity scenario was then developed by increasing the renewable share of the Italian residual electricity mix from 9.49% to 60%, while keeping electricity consumption unchanged. The modified mix reduces GWP-t to 588,555 kg CO2 eq./km (i.e., −0.05%) and in PENRE to 5,807,386 MJ/km (i.e., −0.40%), while increases PERE to 243,617 MJ/km (i.e., +5.99%). The additional cost associated with Guarantees of Origin remains below 1% of the total life-cycle cost. Overall, the results show that the environmental performance of the investigated sleeper system is primarily driven by material production, whereas modifying the foreground electricity mix produces marginal effects in total life-cycle impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infrastructures
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11100358
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Prestressed Concrete Railway Sleepers: A 100-Year Perspective

Gennaro Riccio, Laura Moretti
Infrastructures
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Prestressed Concrete Railway Sleepers: A 100-Year Perspective

Gennaro Riccio, Laura Moretti
article en

Abstract

Railway infrastructure components have long service lives and require periodic maintenance and replacement, making their environmental and economic performance relevant from a life-cycle perspective. This study investigates Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost Assessment (LCCA) to evaluate 1 km of RFI 260-VN prestressed concrete railway sleepers over a 100-year period. The LCA follows ISO 14044 and EN 15804, while the LCCA follows ISO 15686-5 and considers discount rates of 1%, 3%, and 6%, together with a Project Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)-based reference value. In the baseline scenario, the total climate change impact (GWP-t) is 588,835 kg CO2 eq./km, with the production stage accounting for 85.1% of the total. Non-renewable primary energy use (PENRE) is 5,830,475 MJ/km, compared with 229,859 MJ/km of renewable primary energy (PERE). The total life-cycle cost ranges from 2.35 million €/km ranges from €2.35 million/km at a 1% discount rate to 0.92 million €/km at 6%, with a PERT-based value of 1.40 million €/km. A sensitivity scenario was then developed by increasing the renewable share of the Italian residual electricity mix from 9.49% to 60%, while keeping electricity consumption unchanged. The modified mix reduces GWP-t to 588,555 kg CO2 eq./km (i.e., −0.05%) and in PENRE to 5,807,386 MJ/km (i.e., −0.40%), while increases PERE to 243,617 MJ/km (i.e., +5.99%). The additional cost associated with Guarantees of Origin remains below 1% of the total life-cycle cost. Overall, the results show that the environmental performance of the investigated sleeper system is primarily driven by material production, whereas modifying the foreground electricity mix produces marginal effects in total life-cycle impacts.

InfrastructuresVol. 11(10)
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Prestressed Concrete Railway Sleepers: A 100-Year Perspective — Gennaro Riccio, Laura Moretti · Infrastructures (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS