Beyond the Image: Pitfalls, Cognitive Biases, and Safety Gaps in Non-Cardiac Neonatal Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is now part of everyday work in neonatal intensive care, supporting diagnosis, procedures, and decisions in acutely unwell infants. Its spread has outpaced the development of training, credentialing, and quality assurance structures, and the neonatal literature rarely describes how and why the technique fails. In this perspective, we focus on non-cardiac neonatal POCUS (lung, cranial, and abdominal). We adapt existing frameworks into four error domains: indication, image acquisition, image interpretation, and clinical integration. We also separate errors that can occur in any ultrasound examination from those tied to the point-of-care setting, including confirmation, anchoring, and availability bias, time pressure, and fatigue. Using illustrative cases and comparative tables, we describe common look-alike findings, summarize thermal and mechanical bioeffects by organ, and discuss probe and gel hygiene in the neonatal unit. We then outline a stepwise pathway for training, supervision, credentialing, and quality assurance, and suggest practical safeguards: structured protocols and reports, simple debiasing habits, image archiving with periodic expert review, and close collaboration with radiology and cardiology. Seen in this way, investment in safety is part of the value of neonatal POCUS rather than an added cost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children13101352
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Image: Pitfalls, Cognitive Biases, and Safety Gaps in Non-Cardiac Neonatal Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Adrian Costache, Adriana Mihaela Dan, Sorin Liviu Vasilescu, Andreea Raluca Gogoncea et al.
Children
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
article

Beyond the Image: Pitfalls, Cognitive Biases, and Safety Gaps in Non-Cardiac Neonatal Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Adrian Costache, Adriana Mihaela Dan, Sorin Liviu Vasilescu, Andreea Raluca Gogoncea, Diana Iulia Vasilescu
article en

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is now part of everyday work in neonatal intensive care, supporting diagnosis, procedures, and decisions in acutely unwell infants. Its spread has outpaced the development of training, credentialing, and quality assurance structures, and the neonatal literature rarely describes how and why the technique fails. In this perspective, we focus on non-cardiac neonatal POCUS (lung, cranial, and abdominal). We adapt existing frameworks into four error domains: indication, image acquisition, image interpretation, and clinical integration. We also separate errors that can occur in any ultrasound examination from those tied to the point-of-care setting, including confirmation, anchoring, and availability bias, time pressure, and fatigue. Using illustrative cases and comparative tables, we describe common look-alike findings, summarize thermal and mechanical bioeffects by organ, and discuss probe and gel hygiene in the neonatal unit. We then outline a stepwise pathway for training, supervision, credentialing, and quality assurance, and suggest practical safeguards: structured protocols and reports, simple debiasing habits, image archiving with periodic expert review, and close collaboration with radiology and cardiology. Seen in this way, investment in safety is part of the value of neonatal POCUS rather than an added cost.

ChildrenVol. 13(10)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), Bucharest Emergency University Hospital
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.