Intellectual overconfidence and susceptibility to anti-science misinformation

Anti-science misinformation can undermine trust in science, and understanding who is most susceptible is important for combatting its influence. One relevant trait is Intellectual Humility (IH), associated with greater understanding of science and the reasoning skills required to reject misinformation. Three pre-registered experimental studies (total N = 1604) examined IH and susceptibility to anti-science misinformation in the context of consumer genetic testing. A central subscale of IH – Lack of Intellectual Overconfidence – emerged as the strongest predictor, with intellectually overconfident individuals most susceptible to misinformation, though effect sizes were modest. The final study introduced a warning-label intervention that had a small positive effect on reduced susceptibility to misinformation about genetic testing companies, but only for participants with less intellectual overconfidence, suggesting that those who would benefit most from such interventions may be least likely to do so.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Individual Differences
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2026.114106
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intellectual overconfidence and susceptibility to anti-science misinformation

Jesse Lee Preston, Victoria Hotchin
Personality and Individual Differences
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Intellectual overconfidence and susceptibility to anti-science misinformation

Jesse Lee Preston, Victoria Hotchin
article en

Abstract

Anti-science misinformation can undermine trust in science, and understanding who is most susceptible is important for combatting its influence. One relevant trait is Intellectual Humility (IH), associated with greater understanding of science and the reasoning skills required to reject misinformation. Three pre-registered experimental studies (total N = 1604) examined IH and susceptibility to anti-science misinformation in the context of consumer genetic testing. A central subscale of IH – Lack of Intellectual Overconfidence – emerged as the strongest predictor, with intellectually overconfident individuals most susceptible to misinformation, though effect sizes were modest. The final study introduced a warning-label intervention that had a small positive effect on reduced susceptibility to misinformation about genetic testing companies, but only for participants with less intellectual overconfidence, suggesting that those who would benefit most from such interventions may be least likely to do so.

Personality and Individual DifferencesVol. 265
University of Warwick (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intellectual overconfidence and susceptibility to anti-science misinformation — Jesse Lee Preston, Victoria Hotchin · Personality and Individual Differences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS